Tag Archives: California

Marriage Equality and The Thomas Crown Affair

Today we can add New Hampshire to the list of places we can all get married: Connecticut, Iowa, and Massachusetts, with Vermont on the way (September 2009).

It looks like Maine will be next, as a bill that would legalize same-sex marriage is headed to a vote in the state house. The legislation moved forward with a vote of 11 to 3, and is looking like it will pass.

Californians are  still awaiting a State Supreme Court decision on the political travesty that was Proposition 8, a voter initiative that was largely driven and funded by out-of-state religious money.

Of course these religious organizations are already using scare tactics to try and spawn legislation in each of these states with the intent of rescinding the rights of same-sex couples to marry.

After all, same-sex marriage was already legal in California when Proposition 8 was placed on the ballot.

However, watching these states fall one-by-one, I get a little giddy.

It’s easier to move a small state than a large state. The more small states that continue to move toward marriage equality, the more the resources of organizations trying to thwart it will be diluted and rendered ineffective.

It feels a lot like the climatic scene in one of my favorite movies, The Thomas Crown Affair (yes, the remake, I confess). The police are set up in a museum in an attempt to capture an art theft suspect. He enters the museum carrying a briefcase, and dons a bowler. They hone in on him. But, suddenly, men appear everywhere dressed like him, all over the museum. There are so many dopplegangers that the police don’t know where to move next. The first time I saw this, I kept hopping up and down, I was so excited. It was brilliant then and it’s  still brilliant now.

I knew there was a reason I loved this movie. But I always thought it was about Rene Russo’s dance scene in that transparent black dress. I didn’t realize it was because of a political strategy.

(But, you didn’t think I could write about the dance scene without posting it, did you?)

********************

Another Victim of Prop. H8 Pays Gay Alimony

Actor Michael Rapaport is only one of the victims of California’s Proposition 8:

**********************

Transgender California Natives Can Change Birth Certificates

Native sons of the Golden State who have become daughters – and native daughters who have become sons – can now have their birth certificates changed to match their gender, regardless of where they currently live.

Until the recent First District Court of Appeals ruling, California law only allowed people to obtain a birth certificate with the proper gender if they lived in the same county of their birth, or if their current county of residence allowed them to request one.

However, many counties around the country will not recognize this right, an obstacle that this ruling now removes

**********************

NY’s Governor Vows to Lead Gay Marriage Drive

Just as source predicted, NY Governor David A. Paterson announced today he would introduce a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in his state.

He compared the status of gay men and lesbians to that of African-Americans, Jews, women and other groups who were historically excluded from full political and social equality, Gov. Paterson said he would lead a movement to authorize same-sex marriage. “We have a crisis of leadership today,” he declared. “We’re going to fill that vacuum today.”

Read more in the NY Times City Room blog.

**********************

Talk of DOMA Repeal Heats Up

An new article by Kerry Eleveld on Advocate.com says Washington is abuzz with the possibility of repealing at least part of the Defense of Marriage Act in light of the fact two states have now legalized same-sex marriage and more appear to be on the way.

Passed in 1996, during the Clinton administration, DOMA says:

1. No state (or other political subdivision within the United States) needs to treat a relationship between persons of the same sex as a marriage, even if the relationship is considered a marriage in another state.

2. The federal government may not treat same-sex relationships as marriages for any purpose, even if concluded or recognized by one of the states.

At the time of passage, it was expected that at least one state would soon legalize same-sex marriage, whether by legislation or judicial interpretation of either the state or federal constitution. Opponents of gay marriage feared (and many proponents hoped) that the other states would then be required to recognize such marriages under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, which basically says that states have to recognize the “public acts, records, and judicial rulings” of other states

Hop over and read the article on Advocate.com.

**********************

Same Sex Marriage: It Looks Like New York Is Next

newyorkboots2As the same-sex dominoes begin to topple across the nation, it looks like New York will be the next to fall.

The Associated Press is reporting that New York legislative officials say Gov. David Paterson is expected to introduce legislation to legalize gay marriage.

Two officials say he will introduce the legislation tomorrow. They spoke on condition of anonymity because there’s been no formal announcement.

The proposal would revive a bill that died in 2007 and still faces strong opposition despite a new Democratic majority in the state Senate

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Malcolm Smith says he doesn’t believe there are enough votes in the chamber to pass the bill.

Paterson, however, says he’ll make a brand new start of it – in old New York.

The governor was overhead saying “If I can make it there, I’ll make it anywhere. Its up to you – New York, New York.”

(I was kidding about that last part.)

**********************

NOM “Storm” Ad Rebuttal Rocks

Someone got creative with this response to the controversial National Organization for Marriage “Storm Clouds” commercial:

**********************

2M4M Update – Best Yet

It turns out the National Organization for Marriage didn’t bother to register the domain name of its incredibly poorly thought out 2M4M campaign.

An enterprising gay guy with nimble fingers is building a site fast.

Check it out here. (Thanks to Joe.My.God for this!)

**********************

Conservatives Need to Clean Up Their Language

I have to thank Rachel Maddow for saying – or at least almost saying – what we’re all thinking.

Apparently conservatives have never seen the John Water’s movie Pecker, or heard of the practice of “teabagging” as it’s been known in gay bars for many years.

If they had, I doubt they would have been so quick to whip it out and publicly shake it around the way they have.

Take a moment and watch these recent Rachel Maddow clips addressing the inadvertent conservative appropriate of really gay expressions:

If that wasn’t bad enough:

Rumor has it the Republican party found Sarah Palin through Google. When are they going to learn to Google other things before they run them up the flagpole of the misguided party?

**********************

With a Tongue This Slippery, Rick Warren Would Make a Fine Lesbian

Rick Warren, pastor of the Saddleback Church, was at the center of a hornet’s nest of controversy when he was invited to deliver the invocation at President Obama’s inauguration.

LGBT groups howled in protest, because of Warren’s public anti-gay statements. At the center of the controversy was this interview with Steve Waldman, the editor-in-chief of Beliefnet, where Warren expressed his sentiments about gays marrying:

WARREN: The issue to me, I’m not opposed to that [some partnership rights] as much as I’m opposed to redefinition of a 5,000 year definition of marriage. I’m opposed to having a brother and sister being together and calling that marriage. I’m opposed to an older guy marrying a child and calling that marriage. I’m opposed to one guy having multiple wives and calling that marriage.

BELIEFNET: Do you think those are equivalent to gays getting married?

WARREN: Oh , I do. For 5,000 years, marriage has been defined by every single culture and every single religion – this is not a Christian issue. Buddhist, Muslims, Jews – historically, marriage is a man and a woman.

Of course, no one in the LGBT community appreciated being likened to pedophiles, bigamists, or people committing incest, which wasn’t just an interpretation of what he said, it’s what he said.

Now, in an interview with Christianity Today, Warren talks about the backlash against his invitation to participate in the inauguration, and slips and slides around, parsing his language. Here’s his take on the interview exchange above:

In a Beliefnet interview, which was an hour long, Steve Waldman asked me about gay marriage. I said I believe marriage, that term, should be reserved for a man and a woman. I’m not saying same-sex couples don’t love each other. I gave some examples of what I think shouldn’t be considered to be marriage, like an older guy with a younger woman. Then [Waldman] said, “Are you saying that those are the same thing?” I said, “Oh sure.” It made it sound like I was equating homosexuality with pedophilia and incest. I don’t believe it, never have, and never would.

And just to futher confuse things, here’s Warren on Larry King Live a couple of nights ago, claiming he’s not against gay marriage:

However, just before the election, he made this video for his congregation, endorsing Proposition 8:

(Side note to Rick – next time, sit farther away from the camera, please.)

Will the real Rick Warren please stand up?

**********************

Way to Override, Vermont!

Vermont has become the fourth state to legalize gay marriage – and the first to do so with a legislature’s vote.

The Legislature voted Tuesday to override Gov. Jim Douglas’ veto of a bill allowing gays and lesbians to marry. The vote was 23-5 to override in the state Senate and 100-49 to override in the House. Under Vermont law, two-thirds of each chamber had to vote for override.

The vote came nine years after Vermont adopted its first-in-the-nation civil unions law.

It’s now the fourth state to permit same-sex marriage. Massachusetts, Connecticut and Iowa are the others. Their approval of gay marriage came from the courts.

**********************

States & Nations Recognizing Same-Sex Couples

It’s a fast-growing group of governments that recognize same-sex marriages and same-sex civil unions.

There are even a couple to add to the list since my friend E. compiled it just days go (Yea, Iowa! Go Vermont!)… but it’s a good list and anyone who thinks the U.S. is a world leader in LGBT rights should take a look at it.

Read the list here.

**********************

Iowa Historically Civil Rights Leader

I really appreciate the serious commentary over at Box Turtle Bulletin.

Hop over there and read Jim Burroway’s post about Iowa’s recent court decision that allows same-sex marriage, and why Iowa might be the obvious place for the big ball of equality to really get rolling.

**********************

Iowa Ruling Teases Californians Still Working on Prop. H8

Same-sex marriage advocates in California were whooping and hollering as the Iowa Supreme Court overturned that state’s law banning the practice.

(You can see my earlier post about Iowa here.)

But as those advocates argued the Iowa ruling’s language shores up their California case, same-sex marriage opponents argued the cases are not as similar as they seem.

In an interview with the Oakland Tribune, National Center for Lesbian Rights legal director Shannon Minter, who argued before the California Supreme Court last month, acknowledged that the two cases’ issues “are not identical, but the Iowa Supreme Court emphasizes that equal protection is an essential principle that defines the ‘blueprint’ of our government, which is the foundation of our argument in the Prop 8 case.”

“A measure that changes something so essential to our existing form of government is, by definition, too significant to be a mere ‘amendment,’” he said, echoing his argument to the state Supreme Court that Prop. 8 had to
have been a constitutional revision requiring legislative votes to be placed on the ballot rather than just petition signatures.

“It’s obviously not relevant to the current California case,” said Andy Pugno, general counsel for the Yes on Proposition 8 campaign.

Iowa’s court also held that a separate status other than marriage for same-sex couples can’t be considered equal, Minter said. “The fact that two state supreme courts, including now a court in the heartland of our country, have now followed the California Supreme Court’s holding on that issue underscores very powerfully that the court cannot back away from that holding “… without undermining its credibility and stature,” he said.

Pugno acknowledged there’s been a pattern of state supreme courts interpreting their constitutions to permit same-sex marriage, but also a pattern of voters subsequently amending those constitutions to forbid it. “They may do exactly the same in Iowa now.

**********************

Iowa Makes Gay Marriage Look Normal

04iowaspanThis Associated Press photo by Steve Pope in the New York Times made me realize that Iowa is making gay marriage look so normal.

Maybe the country really is warming up to the idea of same-sex marriage, just not California style.

I love my home state, but rally and protest pictures taken of Prop. 8 celebrations, gatherings, and protests look much more flamboyant… we’re tattooed, pierced, androgynous, transgendered, butch, femme, in drag, wearing leathers, feathers, and sequins, and all-in-all more radical.

I’m not saying that’s a bad thing, but I’m sure a good part of the country watches us on the news and finds us terrifying.

Iowa looks ’bout as scary as a church social. I’d let these good folk indoctrinate my children.

Read the story “Iowa court voids gay marriage ban” in the New York Times.

**********************

Same Sex Marriage A-Okay in Iowa!!!

This from the Associate Press just minutes ago:

DES MOINES, Iowa — Iowa Supreme Court says state’s same-sex marriage ban violates rights of gays and lesbians.

Hello? California? Are you listening?

**********************

Portia de Rossi Makes Fake Prop 8 PSA

Last night on ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live, Portia de Rossi offered up this spoof on a Prop H8 PSA:

**********************

College Guys Launch California Domestic Partnership Move

I suspected this wasn’t too far off:

Ali Shams, a senior 22-year-old pre-law student at UC-San Diego, spent his Christmas break framing a constitutional amendment initiative to replace the word “marriage” with “domestic partnership” under state law. Now his project has been cleared by Secretary of State Debra Bowen to gather petition signatures for a potential statewide ballot. Shams’ proposed amendment would take the state out of the wedding business, making marriages a product of church-sanctioned ceremonies, and letting the state government grant domestic partnerships, to gay and straight couples alike. Shams and a friend, Kaelan Housewright, a 21-year-old senior at the California Institute of the Arts, are taking their movement to the internet. You can read more about it in the San Jose Mercury News.

BTW, here’s an essay on the same topic I wrote last October.

**********************

The Defense of Marriage Act

As California sits and waits for a State Supreme Court decision on the legality of Proposition 8, I want to throw a huge shout-out to the legally married same-sex couples in Massachusetts who are now challenging the Defense of Marriage Act. (Read about it on Gay City News.)

And, I’m just wondering: Am I the only one who thinks of it as the “Defensive Heterosexuals Act”?

**********************

Hey, What’s Your Sign?

milk1

Well, there was plenty of media coverage of the State Supreme Court hearing. Ultimately no one knows what the judges will do, and they’ve got 90 days to do it.

The Advocate has this round-up story of how the California newspapers are reporting on the day’s events.

(Thanks to Steve Rhodes for the great photo on Flickr with a Creative Commons license, and thanks to the girl for a great sign.)

.

.

**********************