Tag Archives: civil rights

Kitty’s Wedding – A Creative Protest

My thanks to Dan Savage for the tip-off about this awesome video. Watch as two lesbians apply for a marriage license in New York state and are then refused. Then a gay man they’ve never met steps in for one of the women. They introduce themselves to each other and a license is immediately issued. Now that’s sanctity!

Continue reading

California’s Prop. 8 Back in Court Today

A federal judge today will consider whether to dismiss a lawsuit against Proposition 8, last year’s ballot measure that reinstated a ban on same-sex marriage in California.

U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who will hear arguments in San Francisco, must decide whether to proceed with a trial scheduled for January or throw out the constitutional challenge on purely legal grounds.

Walker has previously said he believes a trial is needed to develop a factual record for higher courts. The case is eventually expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

But backers of the ballot measure contend that a trial is unnecessary because the law is already clear.

Read more on the LA Times blog.

**********************

California Continues to Muddy Same-Sex Marriage Laws

While across the country, people marked National Coming Out Day, and the LGBT community gathered in a show of strength in Washington, DC, at the National Equality March, in California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger quietly signed a bill adding new rights for gay and lesbian couples in the state.

However, the new rights only serve to add layers of complexity to the state’s already tiered marriage equality situation.

Continue reading

I Am Protected… With Some Help From Microsoft

This heart-rending ad, “I Am Protected,” is running in Washington state in support of Referendum 71, which supports more partnership rights for Washington state’s gay couples.

In related news, Microsoft Corp. has donated $100,000 to the campaign in favor of Referendum 71.

That’s the largest single donation in favor of of the referendum. Microsoft is based in Redmond, Washington.

Considering that Alan C. Ashton, a co-founder of WordPerfect, gave $1 million to the campaign supporting 2008′s Proposition 8, the initiative that outlawed same-sex marriage in California, we can surmise that Microsoft’s Word is now the preferred word processing software of  gays and lesbians everywhere.

The “approve” campaign committee, called Washington Families Standing Together, has raised about $780,000 overall, and spent about $200,000. The “reject” campaign, called Protect Marriage Washington, has raised about $60,000, and spent about $35,000.

**********************

Kennedy the Super Hero

I’m a fan of Mikhaela B. Reid‘s awesome cartoon, The Boiling Point. With her permission, I’m sharing her tribute to Ted Kennedy.

KennedyHero

**********************

Obama to Meet With LGBT Leaders

Today 250 gay leaders are scheduled with meet with President Obama to mark the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall Riots.

Let me just say that the one day of the year LGBT folks don’t want to schedule big meetings is the Monday morning after Pride weekend. I’d like to think this isn’t a tactical ploy by the White House to try and catch our community leaders off their game, but there’s a chance they’ll be sunburned, sleep deprived, hoarse-voiced, suffering from walking and dancing blisters, and possibly hung over.

More seriously, The New York Times had a couple of pieces over the weekend that are worth reading before the colorful memories of Pride weekend fades away:

Adam Nagourney’s story on how Political Shifts on Gay Rights Lag Behind Culture and Frank Rich’s Op-Ed piece, “40 years Later, Still Second-Class Americans“.

**********************

S.F. Asks Feds to Toss Prop. H8

San Francisco has asked a federal judge to overturn California’s ban on same-sex marriage, allying the city with a lawsuit that could reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

In papers filed Thursday night in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, City Attorney Dennis Herrera’s office argued that Proposition 8 was motivated by hatred of gays and lesbians and violates their constitutional right to be free of discrimination.

Although sponsors of the November ballot measure said they were trying to promote traditional marriage and protect children, “excluding same-sex couples from marriage does nothing to advance those goals,” Chief Deputy City Attorney Therese Stewart said in the 49-page brief.

Prop. 8′s “real aim was harming gays and lesbians and expressing moral disapproval of them,” Stewart said.

In arguing to throw out Prop. 8, Stewart cited the Supreme Court’s 1996 ruling that struck down Colorado’s ban on state and local gay-rights measures and said a law motivated by hostility toward gays and lesbians is unconstitutional.

Read the rest of the story in the SF Gate.

**********************

Foe-bama? Gays are Wondering

stonewallIn view of the Justice Department’s brief on the Defense of Marriage Act – a law President Obama said he regarded as “abhorrent” when he was campaigning and sweeping up gay dollars – this cartoon in the Washington Blade seems just right.

An editorial in today’s New York Times names the brief “A bad call on gay rights” and suggest the White House take a new direction:

The Obama administration, which came to office promising to protect gay rights but so far has not done much, actually struck a blow for the other side last week. It submitted a disturbing brief in support of the Defense of Marriage Act, which is the law that protects the right of states to not recognize same-sex marriages and denies same-sex married couples federal benefits. The administration needs a new direction on gay rights.

A gay couple married under California law is challenging the act in federal court. In its brief, the Justice Department argues that the couple lack legal standing to do so. It goes on to contend that even if they have standing, the case should be dismissed on the merits.

The brief insists it is reasonable for states to favor heterosexual marriages because they are the “traditional and universally recognized form of marriage.” In arguing that other states do not have to recognize same-sex marriages under the Constitution’s “full faith and credit” clause, the Justice Department cites decades-old cases ruling that states do not have to recognize marriages between cousins or an uncle and a niece.

These are comparisons that understandably rankle many gay people. In a letter to President Obama on Monday, Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights organization, said, “I cannot overstate the pain that we feel as human beings and as families when we read an argument, presented in federal court, implying that our own marriages have no more constitutional standing than incestuous ones.”

The brief also maintains that the Defense of Marriage Act represents a “cautious policy of federal neutrality” — an odd assertion since the law clearly discriminates against gay couples. Under the act, same-sex married couples who pay their taxes are ineligible for the sort of federal benefits — such as Social Security survivors’ payments and joint tax returns — that heterosexual married couples receive.

In the presidential campaign, President Obama declared that he would work to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act. Now, the administration appears to be defending it out of a sense of obligation to support a validly enacted Congressional law. There is a strong presumption that the Justice Department will defend federal laws, but it is not an inviolable rule.

If the administration does feel compelled to defend the act, it should do so in a less hurtful way. It could have crafted its legal arguments in general terms, as a simple description of where it believes the law now stands. There was no need to resort to specious arguments and inflammatory language to impugn same-sex marriage as an institution.

The best approach of all would have been to make clear, even as it defends the law in court, that it is fighting for gay rights. It should work to repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell,” the law that bans gay men and lesbians in the military from being open about their sexuality. It should push hard for a federal law banning employment discrimination. It should also work to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act in Congress.

The administration has had its hands full with the financial crisis, health care, Guantánamo Bay and other pressing matters. In times like these, issues like repealing the marriage act can seem like a distraction — or a political liability. But busy calendars and political expediency are no excuse for making one group of Americans wait any longer for equal rights.

**********************

If You Haven’t Seen “The Defenders”…

… you should. It’ll make you laugh, but in a hollow way. Check it out:

**********************

Court Upholds Prop 8, Advocacy Groups Vow to Restore Marriage Equality

This is the official press release from the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR):

(San Francisco, CA, May 26, 2009)—Today, in a 6 to 1 decision, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8, the ballot measure that eliminated the right of same sex couples to marry. In the ruling authored by Chief Justice Ronald George, the Court stated “We emphasize only that among the various constitutional protections recognized in the Marriage Cases as available to same-sex couples, it is only the designation of marriage — albeit significant — that has been removed by this initiative measure.” At the same time, the court unanimously ruled that the more than 18,000 marriages that took place between June 16 and November 4, 2008 continue to be fully valid and recognized by the state of California. The decision reaffirmed the Court’s prior holding that sexual orientation is subject to the highest level of protection under the California Constitution.

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Carlos Moreno stated,

“The rule the majority crafts today not only allows same-sex couples to be stripped of the right to marry that this court recognized in the Marriage Cases, it places at risk the state constitutional rights of all disfavored minorities. It weakens the status of our state Constitution as a bulwark of fundamental rights for minorities protected from the will of the majority.”

“Today’s decision is a terrible blow to same-sex couples who share the same hopes and dreams for their families as other Californians,” said Shannon Minter, Legal Director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, who argued the case before the California Supreme Court in March. “But our path ahead is now clear. We will go back to the ballot box and we will win.”

The National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, and the ACLU represent Equality California, whose members include many same-sex couples who married between June 16 and November 4, 2008, and six same-sex couples. David C. Codell and Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP are also counsel on the case.

At a press conference this morning, all of the groups vowed to return to the polls to restore the right to marry for same-sex couples.

Elizabeth Gill, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Northern California, said,

“Same-sex couples yearn for the same dignity and respect that others enjoy. The current situation in California is fundamentally unfair, and it is deeply disappointing that the Court let this injustice stand. But we are committed to restoring equality at the ballot box.”

The National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, and the ACLU filed the legal challenge on November 5, after Proposition 8 was approved by just 52 percent of the voters on Election Day.

An unprecedented 43 friend-of-the-court briefs, representing hundreds of religious organizations, civil rights groups, and labor unions, and numerous California municipal governments, bar associations, and leading legal scholars, were filed in the case, urging the Court to strike down the initiative.

“Public opinion is moving in the direction of fairness and equality, and it is only a matter of time until the freedom to marry will again be secure for all Californians.” – Jennifer C. Pizer

Pizer is the Marriage Project Director for Lambda Legal. “Achieving equality always requires struggle, but over time people come to accept that equal treatment and equal protection of the laws is the best way to protect the rights of all,” she said.

“By upholding Prop. 8, the Court has moved our state backward and has put all Californians at risk of losing fundamental rights at each and every election. Our Constitution must ensure that all Californians are treated equally by our government,” said Geoff Kors, Executive Director of Equality California. “Despite this injustice, we are prepared to return to the ballot box together with our allies to restore the freedom to marry. As more and more states across the nation allow same-sex couples to marry, and as we continue our efforts to win the hearts and minds of Californians through real conversations in homes, in neighborhoods, online and on the air, we are confident that same-sex couples will soon enjoy the honor, dignity and protections that only marriage provides.”

There is more information, including pdfs of the decision and other documents, on the NCLR website.

**********************

Another Prop. H8 Protest Graphic

Swipe it and use it!

Minorities&H8

**********************

Help Repeal Prop. 8

**********************

Civil Rights Fail

failwhaleH8

Blog Reporting Newsom Asked Court to Delay Prop. 8 Ruling

Towleroad, which bills itself as a blog site “with homosexual tendencies” is reporting that San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom asked the court to delay announcing its decision as not to coincide with the 30th anniversary of the White Night riots.

Confidential sources close to San Francisco City Hall told Towleroad’s Corey Johnson that the California Supreme Court was prepared to release its opinion on Proposition 8 tomorrow, but decided to delay the ruling after a call from Mayor Gavin Newsom.

Newsom reached out to the Supreme Court and asked them to hold off releasing their decision so it did not coincide with the White Night riots,” said our source.

Towleroad notes that the source spoke on condition of anonymity and that the blog has been trying to get an on-the-record source for the story.

The White Night riots took place on May 21, 1979 in San Francisco after the annoucement of the lenient sentencing of Dan White for the assassinations of San Francisco Maytor George Moscone and openly gay Supervisor Harvey Milk.

The events leading up to the assassinations are the subject of Gus Van Sant’s movie Milk, starring Sean Penn.

The riots caused thousands of dollars in property damage, and the police made a retaliatory raid on a gay bar in the Castro. Many patrons were severely beaten by cops in riot gear. Arrests were made, lawsuits filed, and the show of strength by the gay community resulted in Mayor Dianne Feinstein appointing a gay-friendly police chief, which eased tensions and lead to the hiring of more gay officers.

Since the movie Milk ended before the verdict, I’ll share this short clip of the White Night riots with you:

**********************

Prop. 8 Decision Coming Tuesday

This from the Kate Kendell’s blog on the NCLR website:

On Tuesday, the California Supreme Court will issue its ruling in our Prop 8 legal challenge. We brought this case on behalf of Equality California and six couples who urgently wish to retain the freedom to marry in California, but the Court’s decision will mean so much more to so many—to same-sex couples in California and in states across the country, to those who advocate for minority rights, and to all those who care about equality. The Court’s decision will determine whether or not Prop 8 is valid, and whether or not the more than 18,000 marriages that took place between June 16 and November 4, 2008 will continue to be legally valid and recognized by the State of California.

Any ruling that upholds Prop 8 will be a terrible blow to the thousands of LGBT Californians who have the same hopes and dreams for their families as others.

Read the rest here.

**********************

Maine Embraces Same-Sex Marriage

UPDATE:  Wahoo, Maine! Governor Baldacci signed this in to law today. Congratulations to our most northeastern state, winters are going to get a lot warmer for part of your population!

The lower house of the Maine state legislature has passed a bill that takes the state a step closer to being the fifth in the nation to allow same-sex marriage.

Maine’s Democratic-controlled House of Representatives voted 89 to 57 to enact the proposal.

The bill now returns to the state Senate, which has previously approved it. If it passes there it will be brought to the governor for his signature.

Governor John Baldacci once opposed gay marriage but in April said he is keeping an open mind on the issue.

Massachusetts, Connecticut and Vermont in the Northeast and Iowa in the Midwest have already legalized gay marriage, and New Hampshire’s state senate last month approved a gay marriage bill. California’s State Supreme Court determined that same-sex marriage was legal in 2008, but a voter initiative largely funded by out of state religious organizations – Proposition 8 – removed that right. The state’s Supreme Court is currently debating the legality of that election.

**********************

Does Bigotry Look Better Topless?

nakedcarrieprejeanYou be the judge.

Miss California USA Carrie Prejean, whose anti-gay-marriage (or pro “opposite-sex”) marriage made her the darling of the religious right, and landed her a spot in a National Organization of Marriage ad, recently got naked for the camera..

According to Wikipedia, Prejean grew up in an evangelical Christian home in Vista, California. She is currently a senior at San Diego Christian College, a small, evangelical liberal arts college in El Cajon, California and attends The Rock Church, where she volunteers with their outreach ministries.

Alicia Jacobs, Entertainment Reporter at KVBC in Las Vegas, has reportedly seen all six of the photos and says some are much more revealing. Jacobs believes the pictures may have been taken after Carrie’s pageant-financed breast augmentation about six weeks ago.

I’d count this as another feather in NOM’s media cap. The thinly-disguised front for the Mormon Church, has pretty much screwed up everything they’ve touched recently. Audition tapes of the actors playing “concerned citizens” in their “The Storm is Coming” ad made Rachel Maddow’s show, and they gave their Two Million for Marriage campaign the “hip” acronym 2M4M, internet cruising slang for two men seeking a third for a good time. Now their spokesmodel is naked on the internet.

I’m thinking they need a new consultant.

**********************

This Beauty Queen is Down on Hate

noh8

Raquel Beezley (right) takes a silent stand in support of same-sex marriage, along with Shanna Moakler (center), Miss California USA executive director, and Tamiko Nash (left), Miss USA 2006 first runner-up.

Raquel Beezley (right) takes a silent stand in support of same-sex marriage, along with Shanna Moakler (center), Miss California USA executive director, and Tamiko Nash (left), Miss USA 2006 first runner-up.

In a flip on the reigning Miss California USA’s stance, last year’s title holder, Racquel Beezely, is featured in a photo campaign that features hundreds of portraits of people with their mouths duct-taped in an expression of protest against Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in California in Nov. 2008.

The 22-year-old Barstow native appears in the photograph alongside former Miss USA beauty queens, all in tiaras, in an effort to send a message supporting gay marriage in light of the recent controversy surrounding this year’s Miss California USA, Carrie Prejean, and her on-stage response opposing gay marriage.

“I absolutely respect her for her opinion and for standing up for herself,” said Beezley — who crowned Prejean as the new state winner this year — but says if given the same question, she would have answered much differently.

“I have many friends and supporters in the gay community who were hurt by the comments,” she told the Barstow Desert Dispatch.

The photo campaign, which includes actors, musicians and other public figures, is on display at the Hamilton-Selway Fine Art gallery in West Hollywood.

***********************

Miss California in New NOM Ad

Didn’t conservatives learn their media lessons about handling beauty queens with Sarah Palin?

Carrie Prejean, the Miss USA contestant from California who famously declared her opposition to same sex marriage on the pageant stage, will star in a new $1.5 million ad campaign funded by the National Organization for Marriage, a media front for the Mormon Church

The National Organziation for Marriage has scheduled a press conference with Prejean in Washington today to unveil the new ad, called “No Offense.”

“She is attacked viciously for having the courage to speak up for her truth and her values,” the group said in a press release. “But Carrie’s courage inspired a whole nation and a whole generation of young people because she chose to risk the Miss USA crown rather than be silent about her deepest moral values.”

I’m guessing that bravery had nothing to do with Carrie’s answer. She’s a highly groomed girl on the conservative pageant circuit who gave an audience-pleasing answer, with no consideration to the greater implication.

Carrie Prejean probably knows as much about the implications of Marriage Equality as a race horse knows about the implications of off-track betting.

According to the group, the ad will call “gay marriage advocates to account for their unwillingness to debate the real issue: gay marriage has consequences.”

The Miss California TV ad is the group’s second. Their first, called “A Gathering Storm,” ran in several states earlier and featured actors issuing ominous warnings about the threats posed by same-sex marriage.

If you remember, this ad backfired colossally when outtakes of the actors auditioning to play “concerned citizens” were released to the media.

While I’m sure the church wouldn’t have Carrie do the ad in her swimsuit, I’m hoping they’ll have her wear that funny underwear we keep hearing about.

**********************

Marriage Equality and The Thomas Crown Affair

Today we can add New Hampshire to the list of places we can all get married: Connecticut, Iowa, and Massachusetts, with Vermont on the way (September 2009).

It looks like Maine will be next, as a bill that would legalize same-sex marriage is headed to a vote in the state house. The legislation moved forward with a vote of 11 to 3, and is looking like it will pass.

Californians are  still awaiting a State Supreme Court decision on the political travesty that was Proposition 8, a voter initiative that was largely driven and funded by out-of-state religious money.

Of course these religious organizations are already using scare tactics to try and spawn legislation in each of these states with the intent of rescinding the rights of same-sex couples to marry.

After all, same-sex marriage was already legal in California when Proposition 8 was placed on the ballot.

However, watching these states fall one-by-one, I get a little giddy.

It’s easier to move a small state than a large state. The more small states that continue to move toward marriage equality, the more the resources of organizations trying to thwart it will be diluted and rendered ineffective.

It feels a lot like the climatic scene in one of my favorite movies, The Thomas Crown Affair (yes, the remake, I confess). The police are set up in a museum in an attempt to capture an art theft suspect. He enters the museum carrying a briefcase, and dons a bowler. They hone in on him. But, suddenly, men appear everywhere dressed like him, all over the museum. There are so many dopplegangers that the police don’t know where to move next. The first time I saw this, I kept hopping up and down, I was so excited. It was brilliant then and it’s  still brilliant now.

I knew there was a reason I loved this movie. But I always thought it was about Rene Russo’s dance scene in that transparent black dress. I didn’t realize it was because of a political strategy.

(But, you didn’t think I could write about the dance scene without posting it, did you?)

********************