Tag Archives: gay marriage

Kitty’s Wedding – A Creative Protest

My thanks to Dan Savage for the tip-off about this awesome video. Watch as two lesbians apply for a marriage license in New York state and are then refused. Then a gay man they’ve never met steps in for one of the women. They introduce themselves to each other and a license is immediately issued. Now that’s sanctity!

Continue reading

California’s Prop. 8 Back in Court Today

A federal judge today will consider whether to dismiss a lawsuit against Proposition 8, last year’s ballot measure that reinstated a ban on same-sex marriage in California.

U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who will hear arguments in San Francisco, must decide whether to proceed with a trial scheduled for January or throw out the constitutional challenge on purely legal grounds.

Walker has previously said he believes a trial is needed to develop a factual record for higher courts. The case is eventually expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

But backers of the ballot measure contend that a trial is unnecessary because the law is already clear.

Read more on the LA Times blog.

**********************

California Continues to Muddy Same-Sex Marriage Laws

While across the country, people marked National Coming Out Day, and the LGBT community gathered in a show of strength in Washington, DC, at the National Equality March, in California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger quietly signed a bill adding new rights for gay and lesbian couples in the state.

However, the new rights only serve to add layers of complexity to the state’s already tiered marriage equality situation.

Continue reading

I Am Protected… With Some Help From Microsoft

This heart-rending ad, “I Am Protected,” is running in Washington state in support of Referendum 71, which supports more partnership rights for Washington state’s gay couples.

In related news, Microsoft Corp. has donated $100,000 to the campaign in favor of Referendum 71.

That’s the largest single donation in favor of of the referendum. Microsoft is based in Redmond, Washington.

Considering that Alan C. Ashton, a co-founder of WordPerfect, gave $1 million to the campaign supporting 2008′s Proposition 8, the initiative that outlawed same-sex marriage in California, we can surmise that Microsoft’s Word is now the preferred word processing software of  gays and lesbians everywhere.

The “approve” campaign committee, called Washington Families Standing Together, has raised about $780,000 overall, and spent about $200,000. The “reject” campaign, called Protect Marriage Washington, has raised about $60,000, and spent about $35,000.

**********************

Gay Wedding Bells Ring in Vermont

Same-sex couples are now able to marry in Vermont (as of 9/1/09), but don’t expect a tidal wave of weddings, officials say.

“It’s not a weekend, it’s not a holiday,” say Willie Docto, who heads the Vermont Gay Tourism Association. “There are practical reasons why people aren’t getting married on September 1st. I think expectations are too high for that one day.’

The Associated Press surveyed several town clerks and found only a handful of licenses have been issued for gay marriages in the month of September, nothing like the rush seen around civil unions in 2000. But gay marriage advocates say there’s an easy explanation for this.

Greg Trulson, a Duxbury Justice of the Peace who says he is preparing to perform several same-sex marriages, said, “What I have found, that a lot of the gay marriages that I’m officiating starting September first are other civil unions that I have officiated in the past. And they’re coming back to get married. What we’re finding is they’re coming back on the day of their civil union, to keep the same day [as their wedding anniversary].”

Vermont Public Radio reports many couples are planning small, low-key ceremonies: “Some say they’ve already had several celebrations of their relationship over the years and don’t plan a big wedding.”

**********************

D.C. Now Recognizes Same-Sex Marriages, Thanks to U.S. Congress

Just after midnight, early this morning, same-sex marriages performed in other states and countries became legal in the District of Columbia.

Back in May, the Washington D.C. City Council overwhelmingly approved a bill recognizing these marriages.

What’s significant is that after the vote, the bill required approval by the D.C. mayor and then a legislative review by the U.S. Congress. By law, Congress is charged with oversight of the laws of the District of Columbia, and therefore this new law was subject to review by committees in the House and the Senate. Many observers felt this review was the biggest congressional test on the same-sex marriage issue since the approval of the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996.

The time period for congressional scrutiny ended last night at midnight.

The measure that takes effect today, the Jury and Marriage Amendment Act of 2009, immediately provides the city’s same-sex couples married in other jurisdictions with more than 200 rights, benefits, and obligations associated with marriage under D.C. law.

Spokespersons for D.C. Council members Phil Mendelson (D-At-Large), the lead sponsor of the same-sex marriage recognition law, and Jack Evans (D-Ward 2), a longtime advocate of same-sex marriage, said no implementing rules would be needed for the city to carry out the marriage recognition law.

City Hall sources said the  D.C. Attorney General was preparing a memorandum for the heads of city departments and agencies reminding them that the law is now in effect and that they should be prepared to provide same-sex couples with all the rights and benefits of marriage that have long gone to heterosexual married couples.

Similar to six other U.S. states that have legalized same-sex marriage, gay and lesbian married couples in D.C. won’t be able to receive any of the more than 1,100 federal rights and benefits that come with marriage.

Federal marital rights and benefits are denied to same-sex couples under DOMA.

Gay activists hailed the development as an historic landmark for same-sex couples throughout the country and noted that it opens the way for the Council to pass a separate law later this year allowing same-sex marriages to be performed in the District.

The city’s sweeping domestic partnership law provides nearly all of the D.C. rights and benefits of marriage to same-sex and opposite sex domestic partners who register their relationship with the city. But many activists consider domestic partnerships and civil unions — another form of legal recognition for same-sex couples — to be a “separate and unequal” status that denies full equality for same-sex couples that activists say can only come with the right to marry.

The law took effect one week after a D.C. Superior Court judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by a Maryland minister and six supporters seeking to put the law on hold until they completed requirements to overturn the measure through a voter referendum.

Approximately 55 percent of the population of the District of Columbia is black, and churches in the area with large black congregations have been extremely vocal in their opposition to the new law. Ministers have expressed hope they can rally their congregations in opposition to the recognition of same-sex marriage.

In May, when the council first voted on the measure, The Washington Post reported:

After the vote, enraged African American ministers stormed the hallway outside the council chambers and vowed that they will work to oust the members who supported the bill. They caused such an uproar that security officers and D.C. police were called in to clear the hallway.

Read the entire Post report on the May incident here.

In dismissing the lawsuit, Judge Judith Retchin, in a 15-page decision, upheld an earlier ruling by the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics that a referendum seeking to block the same-sex marriage recognition measure would violate the city’s Human Rights Act. The election board and Retchin each ruled that the referendum could not be held because it would violate the human rights law’s provision banning discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Bishop Harry Jackson Jr., pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville, Md., vowed to continue his efforts to oppose same-sex marriage in the District, saying he and his supporters would seek to overturn the law in the coming months through a voter initiative.

**********************

S.F. Asks Feds to Toss Prop. H8

San Francisco has asked a federal judge to overturn California’s ban on same-sex marriage, allying the city with a lawsuit that could reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

In papers filed Thursday night in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, City Attorney Dennis Herrera’s office argued that Proposition 8 was motivated by hatred of gays and lesbians and violates their constitutional right to be free of discrimination.

Although sponsors of the November ballot measure said they were trying to promote traditional marriage and protect children, “excluding same-sex couples from marriage does nothing to advance those goals,” Chief Deputy City Attorney Therese Stewart said in the 49-page brief.

Prop. 8′s “real aim was harming gays and lesbians and expressing moral disapproval of them,” Stewart said.

In arguing to throw out Prop. 8, Stewart cited the Supreme Court’s 1996 ruling that struck down Colorado’s ban on state and local gay-rights measures and said a law motivated by hostility toward gays and lesbians is unconstitutional.

Read the rest of the story in the SF Gate.

**********************

If You Haven’t Seen “The Defenders”…

… you should. It’ll make you laugh, but in a hollow way. Check it out:

**********************

Court Upholds Prop 8, Advocacy Groups Vow to Restore Marriage Equality

This is the official press release from the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR):

(San Francisco, CA, May 26, 2009)—Today, in a 6 to 1 decision, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8, the ballot measure that eliminated the right of same sex couples to marry. In the ruling authored by Chief Justice Ronald George, the Court stated “We emphasize only that among the various constitutional protections recognized in the Marriage Cases as available to same-sex couples, it is only the designation of marriage — albeit significant — that has been removed by this initiative measure.” At the same time, the court unanimously ruled that the more than 18,000 marriages that took place between June 16 and November 4, 2008 continue to be fully valid and recognized by the state of California. The decision reaffirmed the Court’s prior holding that sexual orientation is subject to the highest level of protection under the California Constitution.

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Carlos Moreno stated,

“The rule the majority crafts today not only allows same-sex couples to be stripped of the right to marry that this court recognized in the Marriage Cases, it places at risk the state constitutional rights of all disfavored minorities. It weakens the status of our state Constitution as a bulwark of fundamental rights for minorities protected from the will of the majority.”

“Today’s decision is a terrible blow to same-sex couples who share the same hopes and dreams for their families as other Californians,” said Shannon Minter, Legal Director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, who argued the case before the California Supreme Court in March. “But our path ahead is now clear. We will go back to the ballot box and we will win.”

The National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, and the ACLU represent Equality California, whose members include many same-sex couples who married between June 16 and November 4, 2008, and six same-sex couples. David C. Codell and Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP are also counsel on the case.

At a press conference this morning, all of the groups vowed to return to the polls to restore the right to marry for same-sex couples.

Elizabeth Gill, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Northern California, said,

“Same-sex couples yearn for the same dignity and respect that others enjoy. The current situation in California is fundamentally unfair, and it is deeply disappointing that the Court let this injustice stand. But we are committed to restoring equality at the ballot box.”

The National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, and the ACLU filed the legal challenge on November 5, after Proposition 8 was approved by just 52 percent of the voters on Election Day.

An unprecedented 43 friend-of-the-court briefs, representing hundreds of religious organizations, civil rights groups, and labor unions, and numerous California municipal governments, bar associations, and leading legal scholars, were filed in the case, urging the Court to strike down the initiative.

“Public opinion is moving in the direction of fairness and equality, and it is only a matter of time until the freedom to marry will again be secure for all Californians.” – Jennifer C. Pizer

Pizer is the Marriage Project Director for Lambda Legal. “Achieving equality always requires struggle, but over time people come to accept that equal treatment and equal protection of the laws is the best way to protect the rights of all,” she said.

“By upholding Prop. 8, the Court has moved our state backward and has put all Californians at risk of losing fundamental rights at each and every election. Our Constitution must ensure that all Californians are treated equally by our government,” said Geoff Kors, Executive Director of Equality California. “Despite this injustice, we are prepared to return to the ballot box together with our allies to restore the freedom to marry. As more and more states across the nation allow same-sex couples to marry, and as we continue our efforts to win the hearts and minds of Californians through real conversations in homes, in neighborhoods, online and on the air, we are confident that same-sex couples will soon enjoy the honor, dignity and protections that only marriage provides.”

There is more information, including pdfs of the decision and other documents, on the NCLR website.

**********************

Another Prop. H8 Protest Graphic

Swipe it and use it!

Minorities&H8

**********************

Help Repeal Prop. 8

**********************

Civil Rights Fail

failwhaleH8

Blog Reporting Newsom Asked Court to Delay Prop. 8 Ruling

Towleroad, which bills itself as a blog site “with homosexual tendencies” is reporting that San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom asked the court to delay announcing its decision as not to coincide with the 30th anniversary of the White Night riots.

Confidential sources close to San Francisco City Hall told Towleroad’s Corey Johnson that the California Supreme Court was prepared to release its opinion on Proposition 8 tomorrow, but decided to delay the ruling after a call from Mayor Gavin Newsom.

Newsom reached out to the Supreme Court and asked them to hold off releasing their decision so it did not coincide with the White Night riots,” said our source.

Towleroad notes that the source spoke on condition of anonymity and that the blog has been trying to get an on-the-record source for the story.

The White Night riots took place on May 21, 1979 in San Francisco after the annoucement of the lenient sentencing of Dan White for the assassinations of San Francisco Maytor George Moscone and openly gay Supervisor Harvey Milk.

The events leading up to the assassinations are the subject of Gus Van Sant’s movie Milk, starring Sean Penn.

The riots caused thousands of dollars in property damage, and the police made a retaliatory raid on a gay bar in the Castro. Many patrons were severely beaten by cops in riot gear. Arrests were made, lawsuits filed, and the show of strength by the gay community resulted in Mayor Dianne Feinstein appointing a gay-friendly police chief, which eased tensions and lead to the hiring of more gay officers.

Since the movie Milk ended before the verdict, I’ll share this short clip of the White Night riots with you:

**********************

Prop. 8 Decision Coming Tuesday

This from the Kate Kendell’s blog on the NCLR website:

On Tuesday, the California Supreme Court will issue its ruling in our Prop 8 legal challenge. We brought this case on behalf of Equality California and six couples who urgently wish to retain the freedom to marry in California, but the Court’s decision will mean so much more to so many—to same-sex couples in California and in states across the country, to those who advocate for minority rights, and to all those who care about equality. The Court’s decision will determine whether or not Prop 8 is valid, and whether or not the more than 18,000 marriages that took place between June 16 and November 4, 2008 will continue to be legally valid and recognized by the State of California.

Any ruling that upholds Prop 8 will be a terrible blow to the thousands of LGBT Californians who have the same hopes and dreams for their families as others.

Read the rest here.

**********************

In Times of Tragedy We Have More Similarities Than Differences

One of the issues frequently raised in the great gay marriage debate has to do with the rights and respect accorded husbands and wives in times of tragedy. Members of the LGBT community are familiar with the horror stories about refused visitation and failure to recognize the decision-making powers of a same-sex partner, or even a legal same-sex spouse.

It’s important to keep telling these stories, especially to the greater community, where the majority of people are straight. I believe that the same people who choke on the idea of “Adam and Steve” marriages with the grooms in matching tuxes, may have their hearts softened by the commonality of tragedy. At a certain age, each of us has experienced hospitals, accidents, illness, and loss somewhere in our life, and we understand the uncertainty and emotion these things bring to loved ones, straight or gay.

A Washington woman is suing the hospital that kept her from her dying partner’s bedside. Lamda Legal is representing her. Read the story in the New York Times.

**********************

Maine Embraces Same-Sex Marriage

UPDATE:  Wahoo, Maine! Governor Baldacci signed this in to law today. Congratulations to our most northeastern state, winters are going to get a lot warmer for part of your population!

The lower house of the Maine state legislature has passed a bill that takes the state a step closer to being the fifth in the nation to allow same-sex marriage.

Maine’s Democratic-controlled House of Representatives voted 89 to 57 to enact the proposal.

The bill now returns to the state Senate, which has previously approved it. If it passes there it will be brought to the governor for his signature.

Governor John Baldacci once opposed gay marriage but in April said he is keeping an open mind on the issue.

Massachusetts, Connecticut and Vermont in the Northeast and Iowa in the Midwest have already legalized gay marriage, and New Hampshire’s state senate last month approved a gay marriage bill. California’s State Supreme Court determined that same-sex marriage was legal in 2008, but a voter initiative largely funded by out of state religious organizations – Proposition 8 – removed that right. The state’s Supreme Court is currently debating the legality of that election.

**********************

This Beauty Queen is Down on Hate

noh8

Raquel Beezley (right) takes a silent stand in support of same-sex marriage, along with Shanna Moakler (center), Miss California USA executive director, and Tamiko Nash (left), Miss USA 2006 first runner-up.

Raquel Beezley (right) takes a silent stand in support of same-sex marriage, along with Shanna Moakler (center), Miss California USA executive director, and Tamiko Nash (left), Miss USA 2006 first runner-up.

In a flip on the reigning Miss California USA’s stance, last year’s title holder, Racquel Beezely, is featured in a photo campaign that features hundreds of portraits of people with their mouths duct-taped in an expression of protest against Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in California in Nov. 2008.

The 22-year-old Barstow native appears in the photograph alongside former Miss USA beauty queens, all in tiaras, in an effort to send a message supporting gay marriage in light of the recent controversy surrounding this year’s Miss California USA, Carrie Prejean, and her on-stage response opposing gay marriage.

“I absolutely respect her for her opinion and for standing up for herself,” said Beezley — who crowned Prejean as the new state winner this year — but says if given the same question, she would have answered much differently.

“I have many friends and supporters in the gay community who were hurt by the comments,” she told the Barstow Desert Dispatch.

The photo campaign, which includes actors, musicians and other public figures, is on display at the Hamilton-Selway Fine Art gallery in West Hollywood.

***********************

Miss California in New NOM Ad

Didn’t conservatives learn their media lessons about handling beauty queens with Sarah Palin?

Carrie Prejean, the Miss USA contestant from California who famously declared her opposition to same sex marriage on the pageant stage, will star in a new $1.5 million ad campaign funded by the National Organization for Marriage, a media front for the Mormon Church

The National Organziation for Marriage has scheduled a press conference with Prejean in Washington today to unveil the new ad, called “No Offense.”

“She is attacked viciously for having the courage to speak up for her truth and her values,” the group said in a press release. “But Carrie’s courage inspired a whole nation and a whole generation of young people because she chose to risk the Miss USA crown rather than be silent about her deepest moral values.”

I’m guessing that bravery had nothing to do with Carrie’s answer. She’s a highly groomed girl on the conservative pageant circuit who gave an audience-pleasing answer, with no consideration to the greater implication.

Carrie Prejean probably knows as much about the implications of Marriage Equality as a race horse knows about the implications of off-track betting.

According to the group, the ad will call “gay marriage advocates to account for their unwillingness to debate the real issue: gay marriage has consequences.”

The Miss California TV ad is the group’s second. Their first, called “A Gathering Storm,” ran in several states earlier and featured actors issuing ominous warnings about the threats posed by same-sex marriage.

If you remember, this ad backfired colossally when outtakes of the actors auditioning to play “concerned citizens” were released to the media.

While I’m sure the church wouldn’t have Carrie do the ad in her swimsuit, I’m hoping they’ll have her wear that funny underwear we keep hearing about.

**********************

Marriage Equality and The Thomas Crown Affair

Today we can add New Hampshire to the list of places we can all get married: Connecticut, Iowa, and Massachusetts, with Vermont on the way (September 2009).

It looks like Maine will be next, as a bill that would legalize same-sex marriage is headed to a vote in the state house. The legislation moved forward with a vote of 11 to 3, and is looking like it will pass.

Californians are  still awaiting a State Supreme Court decision on the political travesty that was Proposition 8, a voter initiative that was largely driven and funded by out-of-state religious money.

Of course these religious organizations are already using scare tactics to try and spawn legislation in each of these states with the intent of rescinding the rights of same-sex couples to marry.

After all, same-sex marriage was already legal in California when Proposition 8 was placed on the ballot.

However, watching these states fall one-by-one, I get a little giddy.

It’s easier to move a small state than a large state. The more small states that continue to move toward marriage equality, the more the resources of organizations trying to thwart it will be diluted and rendered ineffective.

It feels a lot like the climatic scene in one of my favorite movies, The Thomas Crown Affair (yes, the remake, I confess). The police are set up in a museum in an attempt to capture an art theft suspect. He enters the museum carrying a briefcase, and dons a bowler. They hone in on him. But, suddenly, men appear everywhere dressed like him, all over the museum. There are so many dopplegangers that the police don’t know where to move next. The first time I saw this, I kept hopping up and down, I was so excited. It was brilliant then and it’s  still brilliant now.

I knew there was a reason I loved this movie. But I always thought it was about Rene Russo’s dance scene in that transparent black dress. I didn’t realize it was because of a political strategy.

(But, you didn’t think I could write about the dance scene without posting it, did you?)

********************

“In The Life” in the Heartland

This sweet video is a production of public television’s In The Life, a news magazine format television show that reports on gay and lesbian issues and culture. While basically a commercial for Lambda Legal (which isn’t a bad thing), I’m thinking it will make you cry before breakfast:

**********************