Tag Archives: marriage equality

Dissent Marks Possible California Gay Marriage Push

testyourlove

A straw poll of same sex marriage proponents gathered in San Bernardino over the weekend indicated the majority want to return to the ballot in 2010 to try to overturn Proposition 8.

Final count of the nonbinding measure: 93 people voted to go in 2010, 49 in 2012 and 20 undecided.

However, the movement still remains largely unorganized. It doesn’t have a leader or official decision making process.

And it definitely has dissenters.

Some critics would argue that this sort of loose structure resulted in the divisive herd of organizations that paddled upstream against Proposition 8 in the last election.

Leaders that participated in the poll will return to their organizations and then a final decision will be made in a couple of weeks.

However, if they’re going to go place it on the ballot in 2010, they’d better hurry. Ballot language is due to the Attorney General by Sept. 25. And needless to say, careful wording is everything.

Today’s New York Times features a story on how there is dissent in California’s marriage equality movement:

But the timing of another campaign has since been questioned by several of the movement’s big donors, including David Bohnett, a millionaire philanthropist and technology entrepreneur who gave more than $1 million to the unsuccessful campaign to defeat Proposition 8.

“In conversations with a number of my fellow major No on 8 donors,” Mr. Bohnett said in an e-mail message, “I find that they share my sentiment: namely, that we will step up to the plate — with resources and talent — when the time is right.”

“The only thing worse than losing in 2008,” he added, “would be to lose again in 2010.”

Read the entire story here.

**********************

The Gay and Geeky Weekly Heap

Here’s the complete collection of Geek Porn Girl posts, serious and silly, from the past week:

Why Are There No Talking Vaginas? – Well, why aren’t there?

Postcards From a Lesbian Mommy A roundup of links to my parenting & kid posts

D.C. Now Recognizes Same-Sex Marriages, Thanks to U.S. Congress – This post has a growing collection of lawyer jokes in the comments.

Julianne Moore and Annette Bening as Lesbian Moms – Yes, please!

Jan and Marcia Brady in Dyke Drama – Didn’t you always suspect, or at least wish?

**********************

D.C. Now Recognizes Same-Sex Marriages, Thanks to U.S. Congress

Just after midnight, early this morning, same-sex marriages performed in other states and countries became legal in the District of Columbia.

Back in May, the Washington D.C. City Council overwhelmingly approved a bill recognizing these marriages.

What’s significant is that after the vote, the bill required approval by the D.C. mayor and then a legislative review by the U.S. Congress. By law, Congress is charged with oversight of the laws of the District of Columbia, and therefore this new law was subject to review by committees in the House and the Senate. Many observers felt this review was the biggest congressional test on the same-sex marriage issue since the approval of the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996.

The time period for congressional scrutiny ended last night at midnight.

The measure that takes effect today, the Jury and Marriage Amendment Act of 2009, immediately provides the city’s same-sex couples married in other jurisdictions with more than 200 rights, benefits, and obligations associated with marriage under D.C. law.

Spokespersons for D.C. Council members Phil Mendelson (D-At-Large), the lead sponsor of the same-sex marriage recognition law, and Jack Evans (D-Ward 2), a longtime advocate of same-sex marriage, said no implementing rules would be needed for the city to carry out the marriage recognition law.

City Hall sources said the  D.C. Attorney General was preparing a memorandum for the heads of city departments and agencies reminding them that the law is now in effect and that they should be prepared to provide same-sex couples with all the rights and benefits of marriage that have long gone to heterosexual married couples.

Similar to six other U.S. states that have legalized same-sex marriage, gay and lesbian married couples in D.C. won’t be able to receive any of the more than 1,100 federal rights and benefits that come with marriage.

Federal marital rights and benefits are denied to same-sex couples under DOMA.

Gay activists hailed the development as an historic landmark for same-sex couples throughout the country and noted that it opens the way for the Council to pass a separate law later this year allowing same-sex marriages to be performed in the District.

The city’s sweeping domestic partnership law provides nearly all of the D.C. rights and benefits of marriage to same-sex and opposite sex domestic partners who register their relationship with the city. But many activists consider domestic partnerships and civil unions — another form of legal recognition for same-sex couples — to be a “separate and unequal” status that denies full equality for same-sex couples that activists say can only come with the right to marry.

The law took effect one week after a D.C. Superior Court judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by a Maryland minister and six supporters seeking to put the law on hold until they completed requirements to overturn the measure through a voter referendum.

Approximately 55 percent of the population of the District of Columbia is black, and churches in the area with large black congregations have been extremely vocal in their opposition to the new law. Ministers have expressed hope they can rally their congregations in opposition to the recognition of same-sex marriage.

In May, when the council first voted on the measure, The Washington Post reported:

After the vote, enraged African American ministers stormed the hallway outside the council chambers and vowed that they will work to oust the members who supported the bill. They caused such an uproar that security officers and D.C. police were called in to clear the hallway.

Read the entire Post report on the May incident here.

In dismissing the lawsuit, Judge Judith Retchin, in a 15-page decision, upheld an earlier ruling by the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics that a referendum seeking to block the same-sex marriage recognition measure would violate the city’s Human Rights Act. The election board and Retchin each ruled that the referendum could not be held because it would violate the human rights law’s provision banning discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Bishop Harry Jackson Jr., pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville, Md., vowed to continue his efforts to oppose same-sex marriage in the District, saying he and his supporters would seek to overturn the law in the coming months through a voter initiative.

**********************

S.F. Asks Feds to Toss Prop. H8

San Francisco has asked a federal judge to overturn California’s ban on same-sex marriage, allying the city with a lawsuit that could reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

In papers filed Thursday night in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, City Attorney Dennis Herrera’s office argued that Proposition 8 was motivated by hatred of gays and lesbians and violates their constitutional right to be free of discrimination.

Although sponsors of the November ballot measure said they were trying to promote traditional marriage and protect children, “excluding same-sex couples from marriage does nothing to advance those goals,” Chief Deputy City Attorney Therese Stewart said in the 49-page brief.

Prop. 8′s “real aim was harming gays and lesbians and expressing moral disapproval of them,” Stewart said.

In arguing to throw out Prop. 8, Stewart cited the Supreme Court’s 1996 ruling that struck down Colorado’s ban on state and local gay-rights measures and said a law motivated by hostility toward gays and lesbians is unconstitutional.

Read the rest of the story in the SF Gate.

**********************

If You Haven’t Seen “The Defenders”…

… you should. It’ll make you laugh, but in a hollow way. Check it out:

**********************

Court Upholds Prop 8, Advocacy Groups Vow to Restore Marriage Equality

This is the official press release from the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR):

(San Francisco, CA, May 26, 2009)—Today, in a 6 to 1 decision, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8, the ballot measure that eliminated the right of same sex couples to marry. In the ruling authored by Chief Justice Ronald George, the Court stated “We emphasize only that among the various constitutional protections recognized in the Marriage Cases as available to same-sex couples, it is only the designation of marriage — albeit significant — that has been removed by this initiative measure.” At the same time, the court unanimously ruled that the more than 18,000 marriages that took place between June 16 and November 4, 2008 continue to be fully valid and recognized by the state of California. The decision reaffirmed the Court’s prior holding that sexual orientation is subject to the highest level of protection under the California Constitution.

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Carlos Moreno stated,

“The rule the majority crafts today not only allows same-sex couples to be stripped of the right to marry that this court recognized in the Marriage Cases, it places at risk the state constitutional rights of all disfavored minorities. It weakens the status of our state Constitution as a bulwark of fundamental rights for minorities protected from the will of the majority.”

“Today’s decision is a terrible blow to same-sex couples who share the same hopes and dreams for their families as other Californians,” said Shannon Minter, Legal Director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, who argued the case before the California Supreme Court in March. “But our path ahead is now clear. We will go back to the ballot box and we will win.”

The National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, and the ACLU represent Equality California, whose members include many same-sex couples who married between June 16 and November 4, 2008, and six same-sex couples. David C. Codell and Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP are also counsel on the case.

At a press conference this morning, all of the groups vowed to return to the polls to restore the right to marry for same-sex couples.

Elizabeth Gill, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Northern California, said,

“Same-sex couples yearn for the same dignity and respect that others enjoy. The current situation in California is fundamentally unfair, and it is deeply disappointing that the Court let this injustice stand. But we are committed to restoring equality at the ballot box.”

The National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, and the ACLU filed the legal challenge on November 5, after Proposition 8 was approved by just 52 percent of the voters on Election Day.

An unprecedented 43 friend-of-the-court briefs, representing hundreds of religious organizations, civil rights groups, and labor unions, and numerous California municipal governments, bar associations, and leading legal scholars, were filed in the case, urging the Court to strike down the initiative.

“Public opinion is moving in the direction of fairness and equality, and it is only a matter of time until the freedom to marry will again be secure for all Californians.” – Jennifer C. Pizer

Pizer is the Marriage Project Director for Lambda Legal. “Achieving equality always requires struggle, but over time people come to accept that equal treatment and equal protection of the laws is the best way to protect the rights of all,” she said.

“By upholding Prop. 8, the Court has moved our state backward and has put all Californians at risk of losing fundamental rights at each and every election. Our Constitution must ensure that all Californians are treated equally by our government,” said Geoff Kors, Executive Director of Equality California. “Despite this injustice, we are prepared to return to the ballot box together with our allies to restore the freedom to marry. As more and more states across the nation allow same-sex couples to marry, and as we continue our efforts to win the hearts and minds of Californians through real conversations in homes, in neighborhoods, online and on the air, we are confident that same-sex couples will soon enjoy the honor, dignity and protections that only marriage provides.”

There is more information, including pdfs of the decision and other documents, on the NCLR website.

**********************

Another Prop. H8 Protest Graphic

Swipe it and use it!

Minorities&H8

**********************

Help Repeal Prop. 8

**********************

Civil Rights Fail

failwhaleH8

Blog Reporting Newsom Asked Court to Delay Prop. 8 Ruling

Towleroad, which bills itself as a blog site “with homosexual tendencies” is reporting that San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom asked the court to delay announcing its decision as not to coincide with the 30th anniversary of the White Night riots.

Confidential sources close to San Francisco City Hall told Towleroad’s Corey Johnson that the California Supreme Court was prepared to release its opinion on Proposition 8 tomorrow, but decided to delay the ruling after a call from Mayor Gavin Newsom.

Newsom reached out to the Supreme Court and asked them to hold off releasing their decision so it did not coincide with the White Night riots,” said our source.

Towleroad notes that the source spoke on condition of anonymity and that the blog has been trying to get an on-the-record source for the story.

The White Night riots took place on May 21, 1979 in San Francisco after the annoucement of the lenient sentencing of Dan White for the assassinations of San Francisco Maytor George Moscone and openly gay Supervisor Harvey Milk.

The events leading up to the assassinations are the subject of Gus Van Sant’s movie Milk, starring Sean Penn.

The riots caused thousands of dollars in property damage, and the police made a retaliatory raid on a gay bar in the Castro. Many patrons were severely beaten by cops in riot gear. Arrests were made, lawsuits filed, and the show of strength by the gay community resulted in Mayor Dianne Feinstein appointing a gay-friendly police chief, which eased tensions and lead to the hiring of more gay officers.

Since the movie Milk ended before the verdict, I’ll share this short clip of the White Night riots with you:

**********************

Prop. 8 Decision Coming Tuesday

This from the Kate Kendell’s blog on the NCLR website:

On Tuesday, the California Supreme Court will issue its ruling in our Prop 8 legal challenge. We brought this case on behalf of Equality California and six couples who urgently wish to retain the freedom to marry in California, but the Court’s decision will mean so much more to so many—to same-sex couples in California and in states across the country, to those who advocate for minority rights, and to all those who care about equality. The Court’s decision will determine whether or not Prop 8 is valid, and whether or not the more than 18,000 marriages that took place between June 16 and November 4, 2008 will continue to be legally valid and recognized by the State of California.

Any ruling that upholds Prop 8 will be a terrible blow to the thousands of LGBT Californians who have the same hopes and dreams for their families as others.

Read the rest here.

**********************

In Times of Tragedy We Have More Similarities Than Differences

One of the issues frequently raised in the great gay marriage debate has to do with the rights and respect accorded husbands and wives in times of tragedy. Members of the LGBT community are familiar with the horror stories about refused visitation and failure to recognize the decision-making powers of a same-sex partner, or even a legal same-sex spouse.

It’s important to keep telling these stories, especially to the greater community, where the majority of people are straight. I believe that the same people who choke on the idea of “Adam and Steve” marriages with the grooms in matching tuxes, may have their hearts softened by the commonality of tragedy. At a certain age, each of us has experienced hospitals, accidents, illness, and loss somewhere in our life, and we understand the uncertainty and emotion these things bring to loved ones, straight or gay.

A Washington woman is suing the hospital that kept her from her dying partner’s bedside. Lamda Legal is representing her. Read the story in the New York Times.

**********************

There’s a Decision Coming Down

We’ve recently passed two milestone dates in the history of marriage equality.

May 17 was the five-year anniversary of legal same-sex marriage in Massachusetts, and May 15 was the one-year anniversary of the day the California Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage.

The California Supreme Court’s decision was subsequently overturned by Proposition 8, but not before approximately 18,000 same-sex couples had tied the knot.

Since last May, Connecticut, Vermont, Maine, and Iowa have all legalized same-sex marriage. Marriage equality is also close to becoming legal in New Hampshire and New York.

But California is still waiting for the State Supreme Court’s decision in the lawsuit challenging Prop 8.

The decision is due before June 3 and the court has said it will provide one business day’s notice.

Since the announcement will come on a Monday or a Thursday, or on Tuesday, May 26 (the day after Memorial Day), that leaves only a handful of possibilities: Thursday, May 21; Tuesday, May 26; Thursday, May 28, or Monday, June 1.

Mark your calendars.

Meanwhile, if you’re an “opposite sex” legally married couple in Massachusetts who can make a compelling case for why your marriage has been damaged by same-sex marriage in the past five years, I’d like to hear from you.

By the way, “My husband has become obsessed with wanting to watch,” isn’t compelling enough.

**********************

Lesbian Activist Rabbi Heads SoCal Board of Rabbis

deniseeger_2Denise L. Eger is a Reform rabbi and lesbian who has married dozens of gay and lesbian couples. She fought tirelessly against California’s Proposition 8.
.
Now she’s the head of the Board of Rabbis of Southern California.
.
Read more about her in this excellent profile in the Los Angeles Times.

**********************

New Hampshire Passes Same-Sex Marriage Bill, Now Awaiting Governor Approval

The New Hampshire Legislature has passed a bill allowing gay marriage, but the governor hasn’t said whether he’ll sign it.

Gov. John Lynch has said he believes the word “marriage” should be reserved for the union of a man and a woman. But he has not said whether he would sign the bill, veto it or let it become law without his signature.

Maine legislators voted earlier today to approve gay marriage. If it becomes law in both states, they would be the fifth and sixth to allow same-sex couples to marry.

**********************

D.C. Same-Sex Marriage Recognition Carries Broad Implications

The Washington D.C. city council has overwhelmingly approved a bill that recognizes gay marriages performed in other states, a vote could have far wider implications beyond the District of Columbia.

Amid growing momentum from states approving gay marriage, the federal government will have the chance to debate the issue because of a rule that charges Congress with approving the laws of the District of Columbia.

The bill, which was approved by a 12-1 vote after an emotional debate, must first be signed by Mayor Adrian M. Fenty, a step that is considered a formality since he has already said he supports the measure. Then the committees in the House and Senate that oversee the District of Columbia will have 30 session days to review the law.

To overturn it, the House and Senate would have to send a joint resolution to President Obama for his signature. If Congress chooses not to take action within those 30 days, however, the law would automatically go into effect.

“We’re very excited about today — we’ll worry about tomorrow’s battle tomorrow,” David Catania, the council’s first openly gay member when he was elected in 1997, said in a telephone interview. “This is the culmination of a long journey as we attempt to be true to our motto — ‘Justice for All.’”

Catania added that the council had sent a powerful message, “that marriage equality will be the law of this land, it’s only a matter of time.”

Read the rest of this report in the New York Times.

***********************

Maine Embraces Same-Sex Marriage

UPDATE:  Wahoo, Maine! Governor Baldacci signed this in to law today. Congratulations to our most northeastern state, winters are going to get a lot warmer for part of your population!

The lower house of the Maine state legislature has passed a bill that takes the state a step closer to being the fifth in the nation to allow same-sex marriage.

Maine’s Democratic-controlled House of Representatives voted 89 to 57 to enact the proposal.

The bill now returns to the state Senate, which has previously approved it. If it passes there it will be brought to the governor for his signature.

Governor John Baldacci once opposed gay marriage but in April said he is keeping an open mind on the issue.

Massachusetts, Connecticut and Vermont in the Northeast and Iowa in the Midwest have already legalized gay marriage, and New Hampshire’s state senate last month approved a gay marriage bill. California’s State Supreme Court determined that same-sex marriage was legal in 2008, but a voter initiative largely funded by out of state religious organizations – Proposition 8 – removed that right. The state’s Supreme Court is currently debating the legality of that election.

**********************

Does Bigotry Look Better Topless?

nakedcarrieprejeanYou be the judge.

Miss California USA Carrie Prejean, whose anti-gay-marriage (or pro “opposite-sex”) marriage made her the darling of the religious right, and landed her a spot in a National Organization of Marriage ad, recently got naked for the camera..

According to Wikipedia, Prejean grew up in an evangelical Christian home in Vista, California. She is currently a senior at San Diego Christian College, a small, evangelical liberal arts college in El Cajon, California and attends The Rock Church, where she volunteers with their outreach ministries.

Alicia Jacobs, Entertainment Reporter at KVBC in Las Vegas, has reportedly seen all six of the photos and says some are much more revealing. Jacobs believes the pictures may have been taken after Carrie’s pageant-financed breast augmentation about six weeks ago.

I’d count this as another feather in NOM’s media cap. The thinly-disguised front for the Mormon Church, has pretty much screwed up everything they’ve touched recently. Audition tapes of the actors playing “concerned citizens” in their “The Storm is Coming” ad made Rachel Maddow’s show, and they gave their Two Million for Marriage campaign the “hip” acronym 2M4M, internet cruising slang for two men seeking a third for a good time. Now their spokesmodel is naked on the internet.

I’m thinking they need a new consultant.

**********************

Take it to the Mat: Miss America vs. Miss USA

When it comes to chick contests, I’m admittedly more interested in Roller Derby and erotic wrestling than in glued and sprayed swimsuit competitions. However, in the aftermath of this whole Miss California USA “Opposite-Marriage” thingy, I feel compelled to point out that all pageant queens aren’t created equal.

The Miss America pageant was founded in 1921. It began as a “beauty contest”, a title it now eschews in favor in of “pageant”. However, swimsuit and evening gown competitions, which remain part of the deal, now make up only 35 percent of a competitor’s total score.

Contestants are also judged on their lengthy personal interview, which makes up 25 percent of their overall score and does not take place in front of an audience, nor is it usually televised. During their interview they are awarded points based on their ability to be well-spoken, polite, articulate, and confident. Their overall score is also based on a talent competition, and their answer to an unrehearsed question they must answer on stage, which is suppposed to judge their ability to formulate an intelligent, thoughtful answer, on the spot.

The primary prizes for the winner and her runners-up are scholarships to the educational institutions of their choice. The Miss America Scholarship program, along with its local and state affiliates is the largest provider of scholarship money to young women in the world, and in 2006 made available more than $45 million in cash and scholarship assistance.

Young women enter the Miss America pageant by winning regional and state competitions. Miss California is one of those state pageants.

Miss California 2008 is Jackie Geist.

The Miss America USA pageant has been held since 1952, in order to select the USA’s entrant into the Miss Universe pageant. Both of these pageants are operated by the Miss Universe organization, which also operates Miss Teen USA. Competition consists of an interview, and swimsuit and evening gown competitions. There is no talent competition.

The swimsuit and evening gown competitions are held and eliminations are made before the remaining contestants are interviewed. Since 2001, the entire “interview” consists of a single question.

The question portion has now been made famous by Miss California USA 2008, Carrie Prejean, who grabbed a political hot potato in an attempt to please a notoriously conservative pageant audience. She bungled it, burning her impeccably manicured fingers in the process, but landing herself a spokeperson position with one of the most conservative, bigoted organizations in America, NOM, the National Organization for “Opposite” Marriage”. (Now known as “NOOM”.)

The Miss America USA pageant was orginally organized and owned by the swimsuit company Catalina. It has gone through several ownerships since then, and since 1996 has been owned by “The Donald” Trump.

In 2006, Trump’s organization was rocked by scandal, when news organizations reported that Miss USA, Tara Conner, had been drinking underage, tested positive for cocaine, and was in a lesbian entanglement with Miss Teen USA Katie Blair. She entered a rehab program and was allowed to retain her title.

In 2007, scandal hit again when Miss Nevada USA was stripped of her title after a series of photographs appeared in the media, showing her kissing and groping girls, and baring body parts in the very best “Girls Gone Wild” tradition.

By comparison, Miss America travels with a chaperone during the competition and her reign, an element of the pageant that was famously spoofed in a 1994 espisode of Seinfeld.

********************

Miss California in New NOM Ad

Didn’t conservatives learn their media lessons about handling beauty queens with Sarah Palin?

Carrie Prejean, the Miss USA contestant from California who famously declared her opposition to same sex marriage on the pageant stage, will star in a new $1.5 million ad campaign funded by the National Organization for Marriage, a media front for the Mormon Church

The National Organziation for Marriage has scheduled a press conference with Prejean in Washington today to unveil the new ad, called “No Offense.”

“She is attacked viciously for having the courage to speak up for her truth and her values,” the group said in a press release. “But Carrie’s courage inspired a whole nation and a whole generation of young people because she chose to risk the Miss USA crown rather than be silent about her deepest moral values.”

I’m guessing that bravery had nothing to do with Carrie’s answer. She’s a highly groomed girl on the conservative pageant circuit who gave an audience-pleasing answer, with no consideration to the greater implication.

Carrie Prejean probably knows as much about the implications of Marriage Equality as a race horse knows about the implications of off-track betting.

According to the group, the ad will call “gay marriage advocates to account for their unwillingness to debate the real issue: gay marriage has consequences.”

The Miss California TV ad is the group’s second. Their first, called “A Gathering Storm,” ran in several states earlier and featured actors issuing ominous warnings about the threats posed by same-sex marriage.

If you remember, this ad backfired colossally when outtakes of the actors auditioning to play “concerned citizens” were released to the media.

While I’m sure the church wouldn’t have Carrie do the ad in her swimsuit, I’m hoping they’ll have her wear that funny underwear we keep hearing about.

**********************