Tag Archives: prop H8

Miss California in New NOM Ad

Didn’t conservatives learn their media lessons about handling beauty queens with Sarah Palin?

Carrie Prejean, the Miss USA contestant from California who famously declared her opposition to same sex marriage on the pageant stage, will star in a new $1.5 million ad campaign funded by the National Organization for Marriage, a media front for the Mormon Church

The National Organziation for Marriage has scheduled a press conference with Prejean in Washington today to unveil the new ad, called “No Offense.”

“She is attacked viciously for having the courage to speak up for her truth and her values,” the group said in a press release. “But Carrie’s courage inspired a whole nation and a whole generation of young people because she chose to risk the Miss USA crown rather than be silent about her deepest moral values.”

I’m guessing that bravery had nothing to do with Carrie’s answer. She’s a highly groomed girl on the conservative pageant circuit who gave an audience-pleasing answer, with no consideration to the greater implication.

Carrie Prejean probably knows as much about the implications of Marriage Equality as a race horse knows about the implications of off-track betting.

According to the group, the ad will call “gay marriage advocates to account for their unwillingness to debate the real issue: gay marriage has consequences.”

The Miss California TV ad is the group’s second. Their first, called “A Gathering Storm,” ran in several states earlier and featured actors issuing ominous warnings about the threats posed by same-sex marriage.

If you remember, this ad backfired colossally when outtakes of the actors auditioning to play “concerned citizens” were released to the media.

While I’m sure the church wouldn’t have Carrie do the ad in her swimsuit, I’m hoping they’ll have her wear that funny underwear we keep hearing about.

**********************

Marriage Equality and The Thomas Crown Affair

Today we can add New Hampshire to the list of places we can all get married: Connecticut, Iowa, and Massachusetts, with Vermont on the way (September 2009).

It looks like Maine will be next, as a bill that would legalize same-sex marriage is headed to a vote in the state house. The legislation moved forward with a vote of 11 to 3, and is looking like it will pass.

Californians are  still awaiting a State Supreme Court decision on the political travesty that was Proposition 8, a voter initiative that was largely driven and funded by out-of-state religious money.

Of course these religious organizations are already using scare tactics to try and spawn legislation in each of these states with the intent of rescinding the rights of same-sex couples to marry.

After all, same-sex marriage was already legal in California when Proposition 8 was placed on the ballot.

However, watching these states fall one-by-one, I get a little giddy.

It’s easier to move a small state than a large state. The more small states that continue to move toward marriage equality, the more the resources of organizations trying to thwart it will be diluted and rendered ineffective.

It feels a lot like the climatic scene in one of my favorite movies, The Thomas Crown Affair (yes, the remake, I confess). The police are set up in a museum in an attempt to capture an art theft suspect. He enters the museum carrying a briefcase, and dons a bowler. They hone in on him. But, suddenly, men appear everywhere dressed like him, all over the museum. There are so many dopplegangers that the police don’t know where to move next. The first time I saw this, I kept hopping up and down, I was so excited. It was brilliant then and it’s  still brilliant now.

I knew there was a reason I loved this movie. But I always thought it was about Rene Russo’s dance scene in that transparent black dress. I didn’t realize it was because of a political strategy.

(But, you didn’t think I could write about the dance scene without posting it, did you?)

********************

Another Victim of Prop. H8 Pays Gay Alimony

Actor Michael Rapaport is only one of the victims of California’s Proposition 8:

**********************

NY’s Governor Vows to Lead Gay Marriage Drive

Just as source predicted, NY Governor David A. Paterson announced today he would introduce a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in his state.

He compared the status of gay men and lesbians to that of African-Americans, Jews, women and other groups who were historically excluded from full political and social equality, Gov. Paterson said he would lead a movement to authorize same-sex marriage. “We have a crisis of leadership today,” he declared. “We’re going to fill that vacuum today.”

Read more in the NY Times City Room blog.

**********************

Talk of DOMA Repeal Heats Up

An new article by Kerry Eleveld on Advocate.com says Washington is abuzz with the possibility of repealing at least part of the Defense of Marriage Act in light of the fact two states have now legalized same-sex marriage and more appear to be on the way.

Passed in 1996, during the Clinton administration, DOMA says:

1. No state (or other political subdivision within the United States) needs to treat a relationship between persons of the same sex as a marriage, even if the relationship is considered a marriage in another state.

2. The federal government may not treat same-sex relationships as marriages for any purpose, even if concluded or recognized by one of the states.

At the time of passage, it was expected that at least one state would soon legalize same-sex marriage, whether by legislation or judicial interpretation of either the state or federal constitution. Opponents of gay marriage feared (and many proponents hoped) that the other states would then be required to recognize such marriages under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, which basically says that states have to recognize the “public acts, records, and judicial rulings” of other states

Hop over and read the article on Advocate.com.

**********************

Same Sex Marriage: It Looks Like New York Is Next

newyorkboots2As the same-sex dominoes begin to topple across the nation, it looks like New York will be the next to fall.

The Associated Press is reporting that New York legislative officials say Gov. David Paterson is expected to introduce legislation to legalize gay marriage.

Two officials say he will introduce the legislation tomorrow. They spoke on condition of anonymity because there’s been no formal announcement.

The proposal would revive a bill that died in 2007 and still faces strong opposition despite a new Democratic majority in the state Senate

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Malcolm Smith says he doesn’t believe there are enough votes in the chamber to pass the bill.

Paterson, however, says he’ll make a brand new start of it – in old New York.

The governor was overhead saying “If I can make it there, I’ll make it anywhere. Its up to you – New York, New York.”

(I was kidding about that last part.)

**********************

NOM “Storm” Ad Rebuttal Rocks

Someone got creative with this response to the controversial National Organization for Marriage “Storm Clouds” commercial:

**********************

2M4M Update – Best Yet

It turns out the National Organization for Marriage didn’t bother to register the domain name of its incredibly poorly thought out 2M4M campaign.

An enterprising gay guy with nimble fingers is building a site fast.

Check it out here. (Thanks to Joe.My.God for this!)

**********************

Conservatives Need to Clean Up Their Language

I have to thank Rachel Maddow for saying – or at least almost saying – what we’re all thinking.

Apparently conservatives have never seen the John Water’s movie Pecker, or heard of the practice of “teabagging” as it’s been known in gay bars for many years.

If they had, I doubt they would have been so quick to whip it out and publicly shake it around the way they have.

Take a moment and watch these recent Rachel Maddow clips addressing the inadvertent conservative appropriate of really gay expressions:

If that wasn’t bad enough:

Rumor has it the Republican party found Sarah Palin through Google. When are they going to learn to Google other things before they run them up the flagpole of the misguided party?

**********************

Where Can I Buy My Own “Concerned Citizen”?

The group behind a $1.5 million ad campaign targeting states where marriage equality has become legal, or may getting close to legalizing it, has seen its TV ad become a source of headlines in the queer and mainstream press.

It seems that somehow, somebody got ahold of audition footage for the commerical, showing that that the “concerned individuals” featured in the spot are, in fact, actors.

The audition tape has prompted a swarm of media attention. Everyone is in on the act, including LGBT news sites, blogs, and MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Show, along with general news sites.

From Maddow:

The National Organization for Marriage, the group behind the ad, has filed a filed a copyright violation against YouTube, where audition footage of the actors appearing in the ad had been posted. Unfortunately, some links to it don’t work because it’s been removed. When I clicked one link to it, I received a message saying “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by the National Organization for Marriage.”

In short, LGBT equality advocates think the ad is incredibly misleading, especially in light of the information that the individuals in it are actually actors speaking a script.

And, here’s the controversial ad:


**********************

With a Tongue This Slippery, Rick Warren Would Make a Fine Lesbian

Rick Warren, pastor of the Saddleback Church, was at the center of a hornet’s nest of controversy when he was invited to deliver the invocation at President Obama’s inauguration.

LGBT groups howled in protest, because of Warren’s public anti-gay statements. At the center of the controversy was this interview with Steve Waldman, the editor-in-chief of Beliefnet, where Warren expressed his sentiments about gays marrying:

WARREN: The issue to me, I’m not opposed to that [some partnership rights] as much as I’m opposed to redefinition of a 5,000 year definition of marriage. I’m opposed to having a brother and sister being together and calling that marriage. I’m opposed to an older guy marrying a child and calling that marriage. I’m opposed to one guy having multiple wives and calling that marriage.

BELIEFNET: Do you think those are equivalent to gays getting married?

WARREN: Oh , I do. For 5,000 years, marriage has been defined by every single culture and every single religion – this is not a Christian issue. Buddhist, Muslims, Jews – historically, marriage is a man and a woman.

Of course, no one in the LGBT community appreciated being likened to pedophiles, bigamists, or people committing incest, which wasn’t just an interpretation of what he said, it’s what he said.

Now, in an interview with Christianity Today, Warren talks about the backlash against his invitation to participate in the inauguration, and slips and slides around, parsing his language. Here’s his take on the interview exchange above:

In a Beliefnet interview, which was an hour long, Steve Waldman asked me about gay marriage. I said I believe marriage, that term, should be reserved for a man and a woman. I’m not saying same-sex couples don’t love each other. I gave some examples of what I think shouldn’t be considered to be marriage, like an older guy with a younger woman. Then [Waldman] said, “Are you saying that those are the same thing?” I said, “Oh sure.” It made it sound like I was equating homosexuality with pedophilia and incest. I don’t believe it, never have, and never would.

And just to futher confuse things, here’s Warren on Larry King Live a couple of nights ago, claiming he’s not against gay marriage:

However, just before the election, he made this video for his congregation, endorsing Proposition 8:

(Side note to Rick – next time, sit farther away from the camera, please.)

Will the real Rick Warren please stand up?

**********************

Way to Override, Vermont!

Vermont has become the fourth state to legalize gay marriage – and the first to do so with a legislature’s vote.

The Legislature voted Tuesday to override Gov. Jim Douglas’ veto of a bill allowing gays and lesbians to marry. The vote was 23-5 to override in the state Senate and 100-49 to override in the House. Under Vermont law, two-thirds of each chamber had to vote for override.

The vote came nine years after Vermont adopted its first-in-the-nation civil unions law.

It’s now the fourth state to permit same-sex marriage. Massachusetts, Connecticut and Iowa are the others. Their approval of gay marriage came from the courts.

**********************

States & Nations Recognizing Same-Sex Couples

It’s a fast-growing group of governments that recognize same-sex marriages and same-sex civil unions.

There are even a couple to add to the list since my friend E. compiled it just days go (Yea, Iowa! Go Vermont!)… but it’s a good list and anyone who thinks the U.S. is a world leader in LGBT rights should take a look at it.

Read the list here.

**********************

Iowa Historically Civil Rights Leader

I really appreciate the serious commentary over at Box Turtle Bulletin.

Hop over there and read Jim Burroway’s post about Iowa’s recent court decision that allows same-sex marriage, and why Iowa might be the obvious place for the big ball of equality to really get rolling.

**********************

Iowa Ruling Teases Californians Still Working on Prop. H8

Same-sex marriage advocates in California were whooping and hollering as the Iowa Supreme Court overturned that state’s law banning the practice.

(You can see my earlier post about Iowa here.)

But as those advocates argued the Iowa ruling’s language shores up their California case, same-sex marriage opponents argued the cases are not as similar as they seem.

In an interview with the Oakland Tribune, National Center for Lesbian Rights legal director Shannon Minter, who argued before the California Supreme Court last month, acknowledged that the two cases’ issues “are not identical, but the Iowa Supreme Court emphasizes that equal protection is an essential principle that defines the ‘blueprint’ of our government, which is the foundation of our argument in the Prop 8 case.”

“A measure that changes something so essential to our existing form of government is, by definition, too significant to be a mere ‘amendment,’” he said, echoing his argument to the state Supreme Court that Prop. 8 had to
have been a constitutional revision requiring legislative votes to be placed on the ballot rather than just petition signatures.

“It’s obviously not relevant to the current California case,” said Andy Pugno, general counsel for the Yes on Proposition 8 campaign.

Iowa’s court also held that a separate status other than marriage for same-sex couples can’t be considered equal, Minter said. “The fact that two state supreme courts, including now a court in the heartland of our country, have now followed the California Supreme Court’s holding on that issue underscores very powerfully that the court cannot back away from that holding “… without undermining its credibility and stature,” he said.

Pugno acknowledged there’s been a pattern of state supreme courts interpreting their constitutions to permit same-sex marriage, but also a pattern of voters subsequently amending those constitutions to forbid it. “They may do exactly the same in Iowa now.

**********************

Iowa Makes Gay Marriage Look Normal

04iowaspanThis Associated Press photo by Steve Pope in the New York Times made me realize that Iowa is making gay marriage look so normal.

Maybe the country really is warming up to the idea of same-sex marriage, just not California style.

I love my home state, but rally and protest pictures taken of Prop. 8 celebrations, gatherings, and protests look much more flamboyant… we’re tattooed, pierced, androgynous, transgendered, butch, femme, in drag, wearing leathers, feathers, and sequins, and all-in-all more radical.

I’m not saying that’s a bad thing, but I’m sure a good part of the country watches us on the news and finds us terrifying.

Iowa looks ’bout as scary as a church social. I’d let these good folk indoctrinate my children.

Read the story “Iowa court voids gay marriage ban” in the New York Times.

**********************

Same Sex Marriage A-Okay in Iowa!!!

This from the Associate Press just minutes ago:

DES MOINES, Iowa — Iowa Supreme Court says state’s same-sex marriage ban violates rights of gays and lesbians.

Hello? California? Are you listening?

**********************

My Kid’s Gay Hat

novmodernclothhatWe’ve been experiencing a weird phenomenon lately. People have been addressing my 12-year-old son and me as “ladies”.

I suppose this is a byproduct of gay friendliness, but it’s still a little weird.

The first time this happened was in January in Disneyland when a park photographer approached us and said, “Would you ladies like to get your photo taken? You could even have it taken with Darth Vader!”

We sort of looked at each other… one of those movie looks. I told the photographer “my son would probably love to have his picture taken with Darth Vader, but I’ll just watch.”

She sort of stammered and apologized while she handed him a light saber.

Then early in March, leaving a No On 8 rally in San Francisco, a cab driver did it again, “You ladies have a good evening.”

Here’s what’s going on: My son and I are now the same height. I’m sure that by the time school gets out for the summer he’ll be towering over me. In a frisson of sixth grade fashion flair, he’s taken to wearing a fedora. But under the hat, he still has a sweet baby face, right on the brink of adolescence. I like to say he’s stumbling into puberty. And, I look really gay. Although I’d describe myself as a medium-maintenance sort of femme, I like to wear my hair shorter than Rachel Maddow’s, on the verge of crew cut. I have those interesting glasses that seem to be the mark of the modern lesbian.

So, people take one look at us – me looking like a little ol’ dyke and him a similarly-sized person in Chuck Taylors, jeans, an ironic t-shirt, and a hat – and assume he’s my butch girlfriend.

Luckily, my easygoing kid thinks this is really funny… but I’ve decided I’ll throw a couple of bucks in the therapy jar just in case he needs it later.

He's not as tall as Darth Vader... yet.

He's not as tall as Darth Vader... yet.

**********************

Meghan McCain Supports Same Sex Marriage

There’s something oddly appealing about John McCain’s 24-year-old daughter, Meghan, who is getting a lot of press these days for taking on Ann Coulter and telling the women on The View that Laura Ingraham (who referred to Meghan as “plus-sized”) can “kiss my fat ass”. Here she is, telling Larry King she supports gay marriage:

**********************

Ellen and Oprah Together on O Magazine Cover

Oprah Winfrey offered to share the cover of O magazine with Ellen DeGeneres, and DeGeneres — who’s been campaigning for the spot — has accepted.

Winfrey surprised DeGeneres with a video telephone call on Friday’s episode of “The Oprah Winfrey Show.” She told a shocked DeGeneres that she was “calling to officially invite you on the cover of O.”

DeGeneres, who’s been mounting a campaign for the cover during her “Ellen” talk show, told Winfrey: “I can’t believe you’re serious about this. I’m freaking out right now.”

Winfrey had gone solo on the cover of O magazine for nine years before sharing the spot with first lady Michelle Obama.

**********************