Tag Archives: Same Sex Marriage

Blog Reporting Newsom Asked Court to Delay Prop. 8 Ruling

Towleroad, which bills itself as a blog site “with homosexual tendencies” is reporting that San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom asked the court to delay announcing its decision as not to coincide with the 30th anniversary of the White Night riots.

Confidential sources close to San Francisco City Hall told Towleroad’s Corey Johnson that the California Supreme Court was prepared to release its opinion on Proposition 8 tomorrow, but decided to delay the ruling after a call from Mayor Gavin Newsom.

Newsom reached out to the Supreme Court and asked them to hold off releasing their decision so it did not coincide with the White Night riots,” said our source.

Towleroad notes that the source spoke on condition of anonymity and that the blog has been trying to get an on-the-record source for the story.

The White Night riots took place on May 21, 1979 in San Francisco after the annoucement of the lenient sentencing of Dan White for the assassinations of San Francisco Maytor George Moscone and openly gay Supervisor Harvey Milk.

The events leading up to the assassinations are the subject of Gus Van Sant’s movie Milk, starring Sean Penn.

The riots caused thousands of dollars in property damage, and the police made a retaliatory raid on a gay bar in the Castro. Many patrons were severely beaten by cops in riot gear. Arrests were made, lawsuits filed, and the show of strength by the gay community resulted in Mayor Dianne Feinstein appointing a gay-friendly police chief, which eased tensions and lead to the hiring of more gay officers.

Since the movie Milk ended before the verdict, I’ll share this short clip of the White Night riots with you:

**********************

Prop. 8 Decision Coming Tuesday

This from the Kate Kendell’s blog on the NCLR website:

On Tuesday, the California Supreme Court will issue its ruling in our Prop 8 legal challenge. We brought this case on behalf of Equality California and six couples who urgently wish to retain the freedom to marry in California, but the Court’s decision will mean so much more to so many—to same-sex couples in California and in states across the country, to those who advocate for minority rights, and to all those who care about equality. The Court’s decision will determine whether or not Prop 8 is valid, and whether or not the more than 18,000 marriages that took place between June 16 and November 4, 2008 will continue to be legally valid and recognized by the State of California.

Any ruling that upholds Prop 8 will be a terrible blow to the thousands of LGBT Californians who have the same hopes and dreams for their families as others.

Read the rest here.

**********************

In Times of Tragedy We Have More Similarities Than Differences

One of the issues frequently raised in the great gay marriage debate has to do with the rights and respect accorded husbands and wives in times of tragedy. Members of the LGBT community are familiar with the horror stories about refused visitation and failure to recognize the decision-making powers of a same-sex partner, or even a legal same-sex spouse.

It’s important to keep telling these stories, especially to the greater community, where the majority of people are straight. I believe that the same people who choke on the idea of “Adam and Steve” marriages with the grooms in matching tuxes, may have their hearts softened by the commonality of tragedy. At a certain age, each of us has experienced hospitals, accidents, illness, and loss somewhere in our life, and we understand the uncertainty and emotion these things bring to loved ones, straight or gay.

A Washington woman is suing the hospital that kept her from her dying partner’s bedside. Lamda Legal is representing her. Read the story in the New York Times.

**********************

There’s a Decision Coming Down

We’ve recently passed two milestone dates in the history of marriage equality.

May 17 was the five-year anniversary of legal same-sex marriage in Massachusetts, and May 15 was the one-year anniversary of the day the California Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage.

The California Supreme Court’s decision was subsequently overturned by Proposition 8, but not before approximately 18,000 same-sex couples had tied the knot.

Since last May, Connecticut, Vermont, Maine, and Iowa have all legalized same-sex marriage. Marriage equality is also close to becoming legal in New Hampshire and New York.

But California is still waiting for the State Supreme Court’s decision in the lawsuit challenging Prop 8.

The decision is due before June 3 and the court has said it will provide one business day’s notice.

Since the announcement will come on a Monday or a Thursday, or on Tuesday, May 26 (the day after Memorial Day), that leaves only a handful of possibilities: Thursday, May 21; Tuesday, May 26; Thursday, May 28, or Monday, June 1.

Mark your calendars.

Meanwhile, if you’re an “opposite sex” legally married couple in Massachusetts who can make a compelling case for why your marriage has been damaged by same-sex marriage in the past five years, I’d like to hear from you.

By the way, “My husband has become obsessed with wanting to watch,” isn’t compelling enough.

**********************

Lesbian Activist Rabbi Heads SoCal Board of Rabbis

deniseeger_2Denise L. Eger is a Reform rabbi and lesbian who has married dozens of gay and lesbian couples. She fought tirelessly against California’s Proposition 8.
.
Now she’s the head of the Board of Rabbis of Southern California.
.
Read more about her in this excellent profile in the Los Angeles Times.

**********************

New Hampshire Passes Same-Sex Marriage Bill, Now Awaiting Governor Approval

The New Hampshire Legislature has passed a bill allowing gay marriage, but the governor hasn’t said whether he’ll sign it.

Gov. John Lynch has said he believes the word “marriage” should be reserved for the union of a man and a woman. But he has not said whether he would sign the bill, veto it or let it become law without his signature.

Maine legislators voted earlier today to approve gay marriage. If it becomes law in both states, they would be the fifth and sixth to allow same-sex couples to marry.

**********************

D.C. Same-Sex Marriage Recognition Carries Broad Implications

The Washington D.C. city council has overwhelmingly approved a bill that recognizes gay marriages performed in other states, a vote could have far wider implications beyond the District of Columbia.

Amid growing momentum from states approving gay marriage, the federal government will have the chance to debate the issue because of a rule that charges Congress with approving the laws of the District of Columbia.

The bill, which was approved by a 12-1 vote after an emotional debate, must first be signed by Mayor Adrian M. Fenty, a step that is considered a formality since he has already said he supports the measure. Then the committees in the House and Senate that oversee the District of Columbia will have 30 session days to review the law.

To overturn it, the House and Senate would have to send a joint resolution to President Obama for his signature. If Congress chooses not to take action within those 30 days, however, the law would automatically go into effect.

“We’re very excited about today — we’ll worry about tomorrow’s battle tomorrow,” David Catania, the council’s first openly gay member when he was elected in 1997, said in a telephone interview. “This is the culmination of a long journey as we attempt to be true to our motto — ‘Justice for All.’”

Catania added that the council had sent a powerful message, “that marriage equality will be the law of this land, it’s only a matter of time.”

Read the rest of this report in the New York Times.

***********************

Maine Embraces Same-Sex Marriage

UPDATE:  Wahoo, Maine! Governor Baldacci signed this in to law today. Congratulations to our most northeastern state, winters are going to get a lot warmer for part of your population!

The lower house of the Maine state legislature has passed a bill that takes the state a step closer to being the fifth in the nation to allow same-sex marriage.

Maine’s Democratic-controlled House of Representatives voted 89 to 57 to enact the proposal.

The bill now returns to the state Senate, which has previously approved it. If it passes there it will be brought to the governor for his signature.

Governor John Baldacci once opposed gay marriage but in April said he is keeping an open mind on the issue.

Massachusetts, Connecticut and Vermont in the Northeast and Iowa in the Midwest have already legalized gay marriage, and New Hampshire’s state senate last month approved a gay marriage bill. California’s State Supreme Court determined that same-sex marriage was legal in 2008, but a voter initiative largely funded by out of state religious organizations – Proposition 8 – removed that right. The state’s Supreme Court is currently debating the legality of that election.

**********************

Does Bigotry Look Better Topless?

nakedcarrieprejeanYou be the judge.

Miss California USA Carrie Prejean, whose anti-gay-marriage (or pro “opposite-sex”) marriage made her the darling of the religious right, and landed her a spot in a National Organization of Marriage ad, recently got naked for the camera..

According to Wikipedia, Prejean grew up in an evangelical Christian home in Vista, California. She is currently a senior at San Diego Christian College, a small, evangelical liberal arts college in El Cajon, California and attends The Rock Church, where she volunteers with their outreach ministries.

Alicia Jacobs, Entertainment Reporter at KVBC in Las Vegas, has reportedly seen all six of the photos and says some are much more revealing. Jacobs believes the pictures may have been taken after Carrie’s pageant-financed breast augmentation about six weeks ago.

I’d count this as another feather in NOM’s media cap. The thinly-disguised front for the Mormon Church, has pretty much screwed up everything they’ve touched recently. Audition tapes of the actors playing “concerned citizens” in their “The Storm is Coming” ad made Rachel Maddow’s show, and they gave their Two Million for Marriage campaign the “hip” acronym 2M4M, internet cruising slang for two men seeking a third for a good time. Now their spokesmodel is naked on the internet.

I’m thinking they need a new consultant.

**********************

This Beauty Queen is Down on Hate

noh8

Raquel Beezley (right) takes a silent stand in support of same-sex marriage, along with Shanna Moakler (center), Miss California USA executive director, and Tamiko Nash (left), Miss USA 2006 first runner-up.

Raquel Beezley (right) takes a silent stand in support of same-sex marriage, along with Shanna Moakler (center), Miss California USA executive director, and Tamiko Nash (left), Miss USA 2006 first runner-up.

In a flip on the reigning Miss California USA’s stance, last year’s title holder, Racquel Beezely, is featured in a photo campaign that features hundreds of portraits of people with their mouths duct-taped in an expression of protest against Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in California in Nov. 2008.

The 22-year-old Barstow native appears in the photograph alongside former Miss USA beauty queens, all in tiaras, in an effort to send a message supporting gay marriage in light of the recent controversy surrounding this year’s Miss California USA, Carrie Prejean, and her on-stage response opposing gay marriage.

“I absolutely respect her for her opinion and for standing up for herself,” said Beezley — who crowned Prejean as the new state winner this year — but says if given the same question, she would have answered much differently.

“I have many friends and supporters in the gay community who were hurt by the comments,” she told the Barstow Desert Dispatch.

The photo campaign, which includes actors, musicians and other public figures, is on display at the Hamilton-Selway Fine Art gallery in West Hollywood.

***********************

Take it to the Mat: Miss America vs. Miss USA

When it comes to chick contests, I’m admittedly more interested in Roller Derby and erotic wrestling than in glued and sprayed swimsuit competitions. However, in the aftermath of this whole Miss California USA “Opposite-Marriage” thingy, I feel compelled to point out that all pageant queens aren’t created equal.

The Miss America pageant was founded in 1921. It began as a “beauty contest”, a title it now eschews in favor in of “pageant”. However, swimsuit and evening gown competitions, which remain part of the deal, now make up only 35 percent of a competitor’s total score.

Contestants are also judged on their lengthy personal interview, which makes up 25 percent of their overall score and does not take place in front of an audience, nor is it usually televised. During their interview they are awarded points based on their ability to be well-spoken, polite, articulate, and confident. Their overall score is also based on a talent competition, and their answer to an unrehearsed question they must answer on stage, which is suppposed to judge their ability to formulate an intelligent, thoughtful answer, on the spot.

The primary prizes for the winner and her runners-up are scholarships to the educational institutions of their choice. The Miss America Scholarship program, along with its local and state affiliates is the largest provider of scholarship money to young women in the world, and in 2006 made available more than $45 million in cash and scholarship assistance.

Young women enter the Miss America pageant by winning regional and state competitions. Miss California is one of those state pageants.

Miss California 2008 is Jackie Geist.

The Miss America USA pageant has been held since 1952, in order to select the USA’s entrant into the Miss Universe pageant. Both of these pageants are operated by the Miss Universe organization, which also operates Miss Teen USA. Competition consists of an interview, and swimsuit and evening gown competitions. There is no talent competition.

The swimsuit and evening gown competitions are held and eliminations are made before the remaining contestants are interviewed. Since 2001, the entire “interview” consists of a single question.

The question portion has now been made famous by Miss California USA 2008, Carrie Prejean, who grabbed a political hot potato in an attempt to please a notoriously conservative pageant audience. She bungled it, burning her impeccably manicured fingers in the process, but landing herself a spokeperson position with one of the most conservative, bigoted organizations in America, NOM, the National Organization for “Opposite” Marriage”. (Now known as “NOOM”.)

The Miss America USA pageant was orginally organized and owned by the swimsuit company Catalina. It has gone through several ownerships since then, and since 1996 has been owned by “The Donald” Trump.

In 2006, Trump’s organization was rocked by scandal, when news organizations reported that Miss USA, Tara Conner, had been drinking underage, tested positive for cocaine, and was in a lesbian entanglement with Miss Teen USA Katie Blair. She entered a rehab program and was allowed to retain her title.

In 2007, scandal hit again when Miss Nevada USA was stripped of her title after a series of photographs appeared in the media, showing her kissing and groping girls, and baring body parts in the very best “Girls Gone Wild” tradition.

By comparison, Miss America travels with a chaperone during the competition and her reign, an element of the pageant that was famously spoofed in a 1994 espisode of Seinfeld.

********************

Miss California in New NOM Ad

Didn’t conservatives learn their media lessons about handling beauty queens with Sarah Palin?

Carrie Prejean, the Miss USA contestant from California who famously declared her opposition to same sex marriage on the pageant stage, will star in a new $1.5 million ad campaign funded by the National Organization for Marriage, a media front for the Mormon Church

The National Organziation for Marriage has scheduled a press conference with Prejean in Washington today to unveil the new ad, called “No Offense.”

“She is attacked viciously for having the courage to speak up for her truth and her values,” the group said in a press release. “But Carrie’s courage inspired a whole nation and a whole generation of young people because she chose to risk the Miss USA crown rather than be silent about her deepest moral values.”

I’m guessing that bravery had nothing to do with Carrie’s answer. She’s a highly groomed girl on the conservative pageant circuit who gave an audience-pleasing answer, with no consideration to the greater implication.

Carrie Prejean probably knows as much about the implications of Marriage Equality as a race horse knows about the implications of off-track betting.

According to the group, the ad will call “gay marriage advocates to account for their unwillingness to debate the real issue: gay marriage has consequences.”

The Miss California TV ad is the group’s second. Their first, called “A Gathering Storm,” ran in several states earlier and featured actors issuing ominous warnings about the threats posed by same-sex marriage.

If you remember, this ad backfired colossally when outtakes of the actors auditioning to play “concerned citizens” were released to the media.

While I’m sure the church wouldn’t have Carrie do the ad in her swimsuit, I’m hoping they’ll have her wear that funny underwear we keep hearing about.

**********************

Marriage Equality and The Thomas Crown Affair

Today we can add New Hampshire to the list of places we can all get married: Connecticut, Iowa, and Massachusetts, with Vermont on the way (September 2009).

It looks like Maine will be next, as a bill that would legalize same-sex marriage is headed to a vote in the state house. The legislation moved forward with a vote of 11 to 3, and is looking like it will pass.

Californians are  still awaiting a State Supreme Court decision on the political travesty that was Proposition 8, a voter initiative that was largely driven and funded by out-of-state religious money.

Of course these religious organizations are already using scare tactics to try and spawn legislation in each of these states with the intent of rescinding the rights of same-sex couples to marry.

After all, same-sex marriage was already legal in California when Proposition 8 was placed on the ballot.

However, watching these states fall one-by-one, I get a little giddy.

It’s easier to move a small state than a large state. The more small states that continue to move toward marriage equality, the more the resources of organizations trying to thwart it will be diluted and rendered ineffective.

It feels a lot like the climatic scene in one of my favorite movies, The Thomas Crown Affair (yes, the remake, I confess). The police are set up in a museum in an attempt to capture an art theft suspect. He enters the museum carrying a briefcase, and dons a bowler. They hone in on him. But, suddenly, men appear everywhere dressed like him, all over the museum. There are so many dopplegangers that the police don’t know where to move next. The first time I saw this, I kept hopping up and down, I was so excited. It was brilliant then and it’s  still brilliant now.

I knew there was a reason I loved this movie. But I always thought it was about Rene Russo’s dance scene in that transparent black dress. I didn’t realize it was because of a political strategy.

(But, you didn’t think I could write about the dance scene without posting it, did you?)

********************

“In The Life” in the Heartland

This sweet video is a production of public television’s In The Life, a news magazine format television show that reports on gay and lesbian issues and culture. While basically a commercial for Lambda Legal (which isn’t a bad thing), I’m thinking it will make you cry before breakfast:

**********************

Same-Sex Marriage: Will New Hampshire Be Next?

New Hampshire lawmakers are poised to make same-sex marriage legal in their state.

A same-sex marriage bill cleared the House last month, 186 to 179, after initially failing by a single vote. Its future is now in the hands of the state Senate, where it recently failed by a 3-2 vote to win the backing of the Senate’s Judiciary Committee.

Committee Chairwoman Deborah Reynolds, a Democrat, said she doesn’t think New Hampshire is ready for gay marriage. Republicans who voted against it said marriage should be between one man and one woman.

Supporters and opponents could be headed for a showdown as early as this week when the full Senate is expected to decide the same-sex marriage bill’s fate.

Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa and Vermont already recognize gay marriage. Several other states – including Maine and New York – are considering legalizing gay marriage. California’s Supreme Court is still debating the legality of a largely Mormon and Catholic-backed initiative that rescinded the court’s earlier decision that same sex marriage is legal under the California consitution.

Mo Baxley, executive director of the New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition, could not say if the Senate will ultimately vote to legalize gay marriage. But she did predict a fight and a close vote.

Baxley said the influx of out-of-state conservative groups – including the National Organization for Marriage, a thinly disguised front for the Mormon Church, and Catholics from Pennsylvania – have mobilized opposition to same-sex marriage.

“People in New Hampshire are squarely on the side of marriage equality and always have been,” she said.

But, Baxley said, the National Organization for Marriage has mounted an effective telephone campaign to paint the opposite picture, burning lawmakers’ telephone lines with calls from constituents against gay marriage.

New Hampshire legalized civil unions in 2007. Since Jan. 1, 2008, when the law took effect, 664 civil unions have been registered, according to Stephen Wurtz, director of vital statistics in the New Hampshire Secretary of State’s Office.

But Baxley said most gays and lesbians want to be married, not be part of a civil union.

Civil unions do help some couples who need specific legal protections, such as hospital visiting privileges, she said, but the rights are not comparable to marriage.

**********************

Another Victim of Prop. H8 Pays Gay Alimony

Actor Michael Rapaport is only one of the victims of California’s Proposition 8:

**********************

NY’s Governor Vows to Lead Gay Marriage Drive

Just as source predicted, NY Governor David A. Paterson announced today he would introduce a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in his state.

He compared the status of gay men and lesbians to that of African-Americans, Jews, women and other groups who were historically excluded from full political and social equality, Gov. Paterson said he would lead a movement to authorize same-sex marriage. “We have a crisis of leadership today,” he declared. “We’re going to fill that vacuum today.”

Read more in the NY Times City Room blog.

**********************

Talk of DOMA Repeal Heats Up

An new article by Kerry Eleveld on Advocate.com says Washington is abuzz with the possibility of repealing at least part of the Defense of Marriage Act in light of the fact two states have now legalized same-sex marriage and more appear to be on the way.

Passed in 1996, during the Clinton administration, DOMA says:

1. No state (or other political subdivision within the United States) needs to treat a relationship between persons of the same sex as a marriage, even if the relationship is considered a marriage in another state.

2. The federal government may not treat same-sex relationships as marriages for any purpose, even if concluded or recognized by one of the states.

At the time of passage, it was expected that at least one state would soon legalize same-sex marriage, whether by legislation or judicial interpretation of either the state or federal constitution. Opponents of gay marriage feared (and many proponents hoped) that the other states would then be required to recognize such marriages under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, which basically says that states have to recognize the “public acts, records, and judicial rulings” of other states

Hop over and read the article on Advocate.com.

**********************

Same Sex Marriage: It Looks Like New York Is Next

newyorkboots2As the same-sex dominoes begin to topple across the nation, it looks like New York will be the next to fall.

The Associated Press is reporting that New York legislative officials say Gov. David Paterson is expected to introduce legislation to legalize gay marriage.

Two officials say he will introduce the legislation tomorrow. They spoke on condition of anonymity because there’s been no formal announcement.

The proposal would revive a bill that died in 2007 and still faces strong opposition despite a new Democratic majority in the state Senate

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Malcolm Smith says he doesn’t believe there are enough votes in the chamber to pass the bill.

Paterson, however, says he’ll make a brand new start of it – in old New York.

The governor was overhead saying “If I can make it there, I’ll make it anywhere. Its up to you – New York, New York.”

(I was kidding about that last part.)

**********************

NOM “Storm” Ad Rebuttal Rocks

Someone got creative with this response to the controversial National Organization for Marriage “Storm Clouds” commercial:

**********************