Category Archives: Uncategorized

Candy Huevos

Her name was Jane, but they called her Bunny. She was a butch so tough and yet so sweet, you could say she had candy huevos…

This is my offering of the worst-ever opening for a lesbian novel.

But seriously, folks. If the Easter Bunny has left you with an overabundance of Cadbury eggs, considering deviling them and passing them around your next church potluck. You’ll be the life of the party. The recipe is on seriouseats.com.

I’ve Updated My Links…

I finally (finally!) updated my links on Geek Porn Girl. I’ve reorganized some of the categories and new categories for butch and femme fashion. I hope you’ll find some connections you like!

When Good Fruit Goes Bad

Thanks to Dan Savage and his elves for this:

(And to think, orange is my favorite color!)

Magic (Part 8)

(This is an installment in a serial story. To read “Magic” from the beginning, click here.)

Sarah looked at the cuffs warily. Then she carefully removed them from the box – placing them in the middle of the bed – and broke the box down. She stacked it in the back of her closet with the others.

Continue reading

Magic (Part 2)

(This is the second in a multi-part short story. You can read the entire series, as it develops, here.)

In the morning, the apartment was cold. Sarah thought she could see the faint puffs of her breath. Her eyes were itchy and swollen and she rubbed at her nose as she made her way to the kitchen.

“Damn, cat,” she thought. She was sure that today, in the daylight, she could find the cat and shoo it out of her apartment, if there was, in fact, a cat, and she hadn’t imagined it all.

Continue reading

California Continues to Muddy Same-Sex Marriage Laws

While across the country, people marked National Coming Out Day, and the LGBT community gathered in a show of strength in Washington, DC, at the National Equality March, in California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger quietly signed a bill adding new rights for gay and lesbian couples in the state.

However, the new rights only serve to add layers of complexity to the state’s already tiered marriage equality situation.

Continue reading

A Guy Named Joe

I guess music by trans musicians is my theme today.

Here’s another video featuring a trans artist – “A Guy Named Joe,” with Joe Stevens and Ingrid Elizabeth of the hot young duo Coyote Grace.

The video is the directorial debut of the multi-talented Joshua Klipp, another trans musician well worth checking out.

I’m having a little end of summer blast this weekend, seeing Coyote Grace at a backyard concert in Oakland. Lucky me!

And, if you’d like to give these guys a boost, head over to the Logo Online Clicklist and vote for “A Guy Named Joe”. The top vote-getters get airtime on Logo television. You’ll find them about nine spots down in the right-hand column.

Read my other posts about Coyote Grace.

**********************

Prejean Who?

Does anyone remember Carrie Prejean? The pro “opposite sex” chick who was briefly Miss California USA?

(It’s a healthy sign if you don’t.)

Well, Carrie is still seeking attention, and unspecified damages.

Her career hasn’t taken off the way she’d like, even with the topless photo scandal, her mother’s rumored lesbian affair, and all the bells, whistles, cat-calls, and snaps.

She’s blaming the Miss California USA pageant (remember this isn’t the Miss California pagent).

And, she’s suing.

Prejean, who was stripped of her Miss California crown in June, has filed suit against two Miss USA California officials, claiming that she lost her crown solely for her religious beliefs. She is seeking unspecified damages.

“Over the past two months, we have worked hard to provide overwhelming evidence that Carrie Prejean did not violate her contract with Miss California USA and did not deserve to have her title revoked by Keith Lewis,” said the attorney who is representing Prejean. “We will make the case that her title was taken from her solely because of her support of traditional marriage.”

Oddly enough, on some level he’s right. It was Prejean’s unauthorized campaigning for National Organization for Marriage, a political organization that “supports traditional marriage”, that cost Carrie her job. If she had stayed in California and cut ribbons and supported politically neutral endeavors, she’d still be Miss California USA today.

***********************

So Many Powerful Words

We heard so many powerful words spoken during the Butch Voices conference.

I thought I would share these with you.

Keynote speaker Jeanne Cordova gave a keynote address “Keeping Our Feminism, While Exploring our Masculinities”.

A self-described “classic butch,” (that’s “classic” as in “classic coke,” not coke-light, or no-caffeine, or coke-zero – make no mistake) Cordova is an activist, social pioneer, and writer. She is the author of  Sexism: It’s A Nasty Affair! A collection of columns printed in the Los Angeles Free Press (New World Enterprises, 1976); Kicking the Habit – A Lesbian Nun Story (Multiple Dimensions,1990), and the forthcoming  When We Were Outlaws: In Love & Revolution, memoir from a political activist. Her work has also appeared in numerous anthologies and publications.

She spoke about what it has meant to her to be butch and how that identity has meshed with feminism:

So I want to appeal to my fellow butches to take “this feminism thing” seriously. I want to appeal to you in the most basic, crude and self-centered way. By telling you – if you ever plan on keeping a woman past the hot-sex days of the first year of your relationship, if you ever plan on getting married, if you want a femme to stay with you, if you ever want to have a happy, long-term relationship with a woman today – you’d better learn your feminism!

You can read the rest of Cordova’s keynote address on her website.

……..

Sunday at the conference featured a Spoken Word Brunch featuring poets and authors, and other spoken word artists reading their work. I think I speak for everyone in the room when I say the performances rocked us to the roots of our souls.

Hosted by author and comic Kelli Dunham, the brunch was a mixture of young and old, the political and the erotic, the folksy and the oratory. We heard poetry and an a’cappella song by Shams Cohen, a full-time grad student preparing for Unitarian Universalist ministry; a story by author Elana Dykewomon, and a hot story celebrating a queer femme sex worker by Jeff Stroker.

Canadian author Ivan Coyote read an essay about packing in front of her mom and brought the room to tears with a not-so-simple story about a simple haircut. On Saturday night at the Butch Nation performance event, Ivan shared words from these two essays: A Butch Roadmap and Hats Off to Beautiful Femmes.

……..

Lex, a young transgender activist and spoken word artist brought the house down with three dynamic and intense pieces. If you visit Lex’s MySpace page, you can hear at least two of these pieces, “Intention,” and  “Dearly Beloved,” a poem about California’s recent struggle with Proposition 8, which had the audience hooting and cheering with these lines:

For what God has joined together

Let no man put asunder

With the power invested in me

by God herself and the state

of courageous hearts and unshattered commitments

I now pronounce you sacred

……..

Belinda Carroll is a Texas-based comic, and an outspoken femme. She took a serious turn and shared her poem, “An Ode to the Masculine”:

At night I dream about a person of ambiguous gender,

aggressive as well as gentle.

A person that gets my love of shoes but won’t take any of my shit.

A person that is tough, steadfast, and quick,

can admit when they are wrong, but mostly when I am right.

Has a soft shoulder for me at night.

Someone who fights, wrestles, and screams

for a place in the world, and to be seen

as a person loving, whole –

not to be seen as other,

but as a soul.

It’s not, are you he?

Or, are you her?

Or what?

because it really matters not.

As long as you are in full body contact with

your humanity,

you are free to be

with me.

……..

Many of these artists have books, essays, and poems in publications as well as FaceBook and/or MySpace pages, websites, and Twitter accounts and you should get to know their work!

**********************

A Femme Surrounded by Butch Voices

I’m suffering from a sort of culture shock. I noticed it as soon as I left the hotel yesterday.

You see, I’ve long known this about myself: My head turns when I see certain men on the street. Maybe it’s the cut and hang of a leather jacket, the perfect fit of a pair of well-faded jeans, or the shine of a polished shoe or boot. I watch their stride, long and certain, and the way their hips move.  I admire the trim of their hair. And then I think, “Damn. If only you were a woman.”

Well, I’ve just returned from three days in heaven, from a place where the cut, the stride, the polish, and the trim belonged to butches of every shape and size. Whether trans-masculine, genderqueer, female-identified, old-school, or new, they were all represented.

My quivering femme heart will take a long time to still.

But, make no mistake, I wasn’t at the Butch Voices conference, held this past weekend at the Oakland Marriott, simply to ogle the participants. I was there as an ally, to lend my support. I was there to learn. I was there because I love butch women. Butch women are my friends, my confidants, and my lovers. I was there to say “thanks”.

Thanks for all the time you’ve offered me an arm. Thanks for making the bar runs at crowded parties. Thanks for loaning me your jacket, leading when we dance, cooking for me, wrapping me up in big authentic hugs, and letting me cry on your shoulder.

Thank you for the reverence and respect with which you’ve touched my body – sometimes with more regard than I was feeling for it myself.

I was there to say thanks for being the most visual icons of our lesbian sub-culture. Thank you for taking the public heat for all of us. In your roles as outlaws and gender-benders, you are our front-men.

From the moment we arrived, I was conscious of my role as a non-butch participant. I’m a buzz-cut, sort of low-maintenance femme, and I had anticipated this and didn’t want to spend days explaining my gender orientation. So I packed a dress, strappy sandals, and got a fresh pedicure in preparation. I wanted to be clear about my position, and not appear to be teetering on top of the fence.

Femmes were definitely in the minority and I chose my workshops carefully, not wanting to encroach on others’ opportunities for butch bonding. The public visibility of butch women led to such workshops as “Non-conforming Gender Presentation and Job Searching,” “Politics of Passing,” and “Butch in the Streets: Techniques for Increasing Safety in Public”.  I did not attend these. I attended S. Bear Bergman’s workshop on chivalry, and Ivan Coyote’s workshop on beating writing procrastination.  I did not attend the workshop called “An Exploration of Dick,” even though I have more than a passing acquaintance with the topic. Strap-ons and toys, are just that for me – toys. They’re not My Dick. (And that’s only one of the things that marks me as femme.) This was a conversation the butches needed to have amongst themselves. But to be clear, as a femme ally, I was never made to feel unwelcome. The places I didn’t go were by my own choice.

In response, I suppose, to the bonding and visibility of the assembled butches, I heard several young femme women express how they feel invisible to their own community – that they’re not immediately recognized as lesbian and have to work to be noticed by the very women they want to attract.

To some degree I understand this because my usual fashion accessory is a 12-year-old son, which identifies me as a mommy above all else. I think in liberal places and among my peers, I’m often read as a gay woman, but in many environments, I’m just an older orchestra mom with an edgy haircut and funky glasses.

And, I hear women over 40, lesbian and straight alike, complain about their invisibility to the world as a whole. They say younger people don’t look them in the eye, and until we become senior citizens, don’t extend us the courtesies they jump to extend to younger women. I suppose that’s a valid complaint in a society that places a high value on feminine youth and beauty. I think I circumvent this by going out of my way to make eye contact with strangers,  and I am more likely to extend my courtesies to others – male or female – as to expect them extended to me. As a result, I don’t feel invisible so much as capable, if by necessity. I’ve worked in lots of environments where I was expected to lift, tote, and carry, and have set-up and stacked more folding tables and chairs than I would ever like to count. My egalitarianism makes my life run smoothly but doesn’t make me feel special.

Maybe that’s why I came home from Butch Voices feeling like a queen.

Yes, I felt conspicuous in my femininity among all the butch bodies. Yes, I was in the minority.

But I felt seen, valued, and cared for. I felt nurtured. It never occurred to me to move a folding chair. I’m pretty certain it would have been an insult to try, and I’m not bothered by that one iota. I do my share in other environments and had nothing to prove in this one. Everyone I met was warm in their greetings, gracious in their communications, conscious of their impact on the space around them. I heard one femme woman say that at the Saturday night Butch Nation entertainment review – which was jam-packed – she had never had so many people apologize for bumping into her.

Maybe this is because of the special pride so many butch women take in their manners. Maybe this is because we have all been socialized as female to some degree, and therefore have a special understanding of the value of warmth and courtesy.

In the past, I have told my son that if he wants to learn good manners and treat women with respect, he only has to look to his butch “uncles” for advice. And after this weekend, I stand by that now, more than ever.

My heartfelt thanks to Joe LeBlanc, the conference chair and Butch Voices board president, and the incredible group that put the conference together.

Here are all of the posts I made following the Butch Voices 2009 conference.

**********************

It’s a Coloring Contest AND a Birthday Celebration

Color this panel!

To help me celebrate Geek Porn Girl‘s second birthday, Christine Phillips of the The Erotic Lesbian Coloring Book illustrated a story from my archives, and you’re invited to participate in a very cool coloring contest (details below).

When I started Geek Porn Girl, two years ago this month, it was a repository for my collection of nerdy lesbian-themed fiction. The “geek porn” in the name was because the stories aren’t truly erotic in any explicit sense. Instead they suffer from an awkward, unfinished quality. And to be honest, the name has caused some confusion.

About a year ago, I decided I wanted to expand my writing into other areas. I kept running across news items and other kinds of stories and thinking “that’s so Geek Porn Girl,” meaning I thought it was stuff the people who appreciated my fiction would want to read. In truth, I was also motivated by the fall elections, and the specter of California’s Proposition 8 that was looming in front of our community. I wanted my voice to be heard, as well as the voices of the people who read this site.

When I marked GPG’s first birthday last year, there were more than 30 stories on the site. This year I wrote about 10 more pieces  of fiction – stories about women shopping for a strap-on, visiting a bathhouse, exercising math prowress, flirting at a blogging conference, and hooking up at Obama’s inauguration. I wrote a week-long 5-part series in celebration of same-sex love and marriage.

And, in addition to that, I published literally hundreds – I think, more than 400 – additional posts that ranged from serious opinion pieces to parenting stories to just plain silly. While I try to keep the site filled with original writing, I’ve also included links to other interesting stories, and cartoons that are available to share. I also archived my erotic haiku collection here.

When I asked Christine if she would like to collaborate by illustrating a story, we discovered a common love of The Cowboy Junkies. And because of that, she chose to illustrate “Following the Thread,” a story from my fiction archives. To be honest, this isn’t the spiciest story on this site. It’s a romantic and sweet rainy-day story about knitting and the possibility of true love. However, Christine managed to find the underlying erotic potential as her illustration shows. All I can say is “oh, yum” and “oh, thank you!”.

The Contest: It’s simple and fun. Download Christine’s panel #16 (above or here), the illustration for “Following the Thread,” and color it any way you see fit. You can color it digitally, or print it out and color it by hand and then scan or photograph it. You can use any medium you’d like. However, please maintain the original dimensions. Then send the image to me, in .jpg form,  at geekporngirl@yahoo.com. Send it to me no later than September 9, 2009.

All the returned images will get recognition on the site. The winning image will live in perpetuity as the illustration for the story, and you’ll get shared credit as the colorist, complete with a link to your website, blog, twitterstream, or favorite non-profit.

Additionally, Christine and I think something else may happen with the images – we’re talking about a downloadable art print, a t-shirt, something – and we’ll keep you notified as that plan jells.

**********************

Comments and Marriage Equality

I try to remember to write thank you notes for the comments people leave on this blog. Finding a well-thought-out or enthusiastic comment always makes my day. It lets me know what people are thinking, and it motivates me to keep writing.

There were some special ones this week. One woman, new to the site, wrote effusively to say;

Your blog is  fascinating, educational, hilarious, mesmerizing, intellectual, entertaining, inspiring and a bit naughty all at the same time.  I feel drunk now, thank you.

No, thank you. You made my day.

Another, a guy in Canada who follows me on Twitter and has been caring for his elderly father, wrote with kind words about the death of my friend, the veteran.

A regular reader, the author of many well-crafted comments, left her thoughts about the potential 2010 marriage equality push in California.

And, sometimes – in the way the best comments can – it motivated me to write more on the topic. One minute I was writing her a note of thanks, and in the next, I realized it would make an opinion post of its own:

Thank you for your thoughtful comment about the same-sex marriage push. I’m with you. I felt really disenfranchised through the last go-round – not by the idea of marriage equality, mind you – but by a campaign that appeared to be reactionary and fractured. Even at my local level, I wasn’t sure where money was going, or who was in charge.

The amount of money spent by both sides of the campaign – an estimated $73 million – is appalling, especially in light of the economy and all of the social and human services that are struggling or going unfunded. Church organizations who helped to fund Proposition 8 should be especially ashamed. When did God’s work become persecution and diverting resources away from the needy and the poor?

I think California marriage equality needs a better public relations campaign, one that starts at the grassroots level. Along with our rallies and fundraisers (which tend to attract our own and become media spectacles) we need more public speakers visiting service groups and churches.

We need to be reaching into communities up and down the state and talking about the economic impact of marriage equality to Realtors, Rotarians, and business organizations, about the need for recognized unions and families to educational and church groups. We need to talk about the potential impact of gay marriage on the state’s over-taxed adoption and foster parenting programs. We need to talk about civil rights to labor and ethnic organizations.

We need time to field questions and answers, to shake hands, and have rubber chicken lunches and punch in church halls. We need people to understand that marriage equality is about much more than government-recognized gay sex.

I love the queer craziness of our community as much as the next native California lesbian, but we have to remember that when we try to change the public mind by show up at rallies in flamboyant drag or holding kiss-ins, we’re going to lose as many votes as we gain. The same things that make great media images on the 6 o’clock news, and colorful photos on the front page of the newspapers serve to substantially increase the “ick” factor of homosexuality in communities that already aren’t voting with us. They can’t separate extremism from the core message.

Most importantly, we – the gay and lesbian community –  have to remember what we’re trying to sell. We’re trying to sell the conservative heartland of the state on the idea of equal recognition of loving relationships, not on the media reduction of the “gay lifestyle”. We’re talking wedding rings, children, Pottery Barn, and “until death do us part” – not leather parties and Dinah Shore.

I personally don’t think we can get it together for a 2010 election. I think it’s going to take a couple of years to gather resources, and most importantly, focus.

We need marriage equality to win big in California, not by two percent, or five percent. We need a landslide, an outpouring of support from people who understand and sympathize. We need unimpeachable language. We need a victory that won’t have to immediately be defended in court, or at the polls, yet again.

And that’s going to take some time, because first we need people to meet us and understand.

They don’t have to love us, but they do have to understand.

**********************

Dissent Marks Possible California Gay Marriage Push

testyourlove

A straw poll of same sex marriage proponents gathered in San Bernardino over the weekend indicated the majority want to return to the ballot in 2010 to try to overturn Proposition 8.

Final count of the nonbinding measure: 93 people voted to go in 2010, 49 in 2012 and 20 undecided.

However, the movement still remains largely unorganized. It doesn’t have a leader or official decision making process.

And it definitely has dissenters.

Some critics would argue that this sort of loose structure resulted in the divisive herd of organizations that paddled upstream against Proposition 8 in the last election.

Leaders that participated in the poll will return to their organizations and then a final decision will be made in a couple of weeks.

However, if they’re going to go place it on the ballot in 2010, they’d better hurry. Ballot language is due to the Attorney General by Sept. 25. And needless to say, careful wording is everything.

Today’s New York Times features a story on how there is dissent in California’s marriage equality movement:

But the timing of another campaign has since been questioned by several of the movement’s big donors, including David Bohnett, a millionaire philanthropist and technology entrepreneur who gave more than $1 million to the unsuccessful campaign to defeat Proposition 8.

“In conversations with a number of my fellow major No on 8 donors,” Mr. Bohnett said in an e-mail message, “I find that they share my sentiment: namely, that we will step up to the plate — with resources and talent — when the time is right.”

“The only thing worse than losing in 2008,” he added, “would be to lose again in 2010.”

Read the entire story here.

**********************

“Other” Motherhood Begins at Birth in DC

Children born through artificial insemination can now legally have two female parents at birth in Washington, D.C., thanks to a new law.

The new law negates the need for the female partner of the birth mother to go through a complicated adoption process to legally become the child’s “other mother”.

American University law professor Nancy Polikoff, who helped draft the District of Columbia’s Domestic Partnership Judicial Determination Parentage Act of 2009, noted that when a heterosexual married couple uses artificial insemination, the husband does not have to adopt the child.

“He is the child’s legal parent automatically. Now the child of a lesbian couple will have the same economic and emotional security,” Polikoff told The Washington Post. “A mother should not have to adopt her own child.”

The law is the first of its kind in the country. A similar law goes into effect in January 2010 in New Mexico.

By law, Congress is charged with oversight of the laws of the District of Columbia, and many people feel recent decisions are a litmus indicator of Congressional  attitude toward LGBT rights.

Earlier this month, with Congressional approval, the district began recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states and countries.

**********************

The Gay and Geeky Weekly Heap

Here’s the complete collection of Geek Porn Girl posts, serious and silly, from the past week:

Why Are There No Talking Vaginas? – Well, why aren’t there?

Postcards From a Lesbian Mommy A roundup of links to my parenting & kid posts

D.C. Now Recognizes Same-Sex Marriages, Thanks to U.S. Congress – This post has a growing collection of lawyer jokes in the comments.

Julianne Moore and Annette Bening as Lesbian Moms – Yes, please!

Jan and Marcia Brady in Dyke Drama – Didn’t you always suspect, or at least wish?

**********************

Jan and Marcia Brady in Dyke Drama

Marcia&JanBradyThis might be the ultimate answer to the lesbian drinking question “Marcia or Jan?”:

Marcia and Jan.

It looks like Oprah’s Brady Bunch reunion will be minus Eve Plumb, the actress that played Jan.

But the real reason is unknown.

Maureen McCormick, who played Marcia on the show, says she thinks her costar may be upset over a joke she made about them having a girl-on-girl affair years ago.

McCormick, writing for Fancast.com, said the Brady kids were to reunite on Oprah this September for the 40th anniversary of the show. All of them accepted the invitation except Plumb, a move McCormick potentially attributed to the joke.

“Eve Plumb…used to be my best friend but now apparently wants to distance herself from the show and, most troubling, from me,” she wrote. “I have no idea why, unless she’s mad at the joke I made a few years ago that we’d had a lesbian love affair. I made the crack to be funny – and for shock value. I’m sorry if she took offense.

However, last year McCormick published a memoir, Here’s the Story: Surviving Marcia Brady and Finding My True Voice in which she candidly detailed all of the good and bad aspects of being a teen star and how she got caught up in a fast-paced, drug-fueled, star-studded Hollywood existence.

In fact, the book reveals so much that Marcia and Jan in a little teenage tangle doesn’t seem far fetched at all.

Internet sources are reporting that McCormick was all set to reveal a fling with Plumb, but McCormick says it was just a joke.

Plumb has participated in several Brady Bunch reunions. Most recently, In October, the group reunited to tape several episodes of a televised game show hosted by her Brady co-star Christopher Knight. All of the Brady siblings were there, except Maureen McCormick, who was on a book tour at the time.

Prior to the book’s publication, the National Enquirer was reporting that “The most explosive comments will be how the then-blonde, blue-eyed cutie developed a crush on Eve Plumb, which led to some sexual play. This book will certainly come as a shocker. While Maureen is not a lesbian, she reveals there were some sexual hijinks going on behind the scenes.”

I don’t think the book includes this revelation (please drop a comment if you’ve read it), but that doesn’t mean it was edited out prior to publication.

I’m sure that even a hint of possibility of Jan and Marcia rolling around together has a whole fleet of 40-something straight guys and gay women running off for some private time.

But whether the two of them were actually entangled or not, when two women can’t be at the same reunion at the same time and one of them says she’s “only joking” about a fling, it’s a dyke drama by definition.

**********************

D.C. Now Recognizes Same-Sex Marriages, Thanks to U.S. Congress

Just after midnight, early this morning, same-sex marriages performed in other states and countries became legal in the District of Columbia.

Back in May, the Washington D.C. City Council overwhelmingly approved a bill recognizing these marriages.

What’s significant is that after the vote, the bill required approval by the D.C. mayor and then a legislative review by the U.S. Congress. By law, Congress is charged with oversight of the laws of the District of Columbia, and therefore this new law was subject to review by committees in the House and the Senate. Many observers felt this review was the biggest congressional test on the same-sex marriage issue since the approval of the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996.

The time period for congressional scrutiny ended last night at midnight.

The measure that takes effect today, the Jury and Marriage Amendment Act of 2009, immediately provides the city’s same-sex couples married in other jurisdictions with more than 200 rights, benefits, and obligations associated with marriage under D.C. law.

Spokespersons for D.C. Council members Phil Mendelson (D-At-Large), the lead sponsor of the same-sex marriage recognition law, and Jack Evans (D-Ward 2), a longtime advocate of same-sex marriage, said no implementing rules would be needed for the city to carry out the marriage recognition law.

City Hall sources said the  D.C. Attorney General was preparing a memorandum for the heads of city departments and agencies reminding them that the law is now in effect and that they should be prepared to provide same-sex couples with all the rights and benefits of marriage that have long gone to heterosexual married couples.

Similar to six other U.S. states that have legalized same-sex marriage, gay and lesbian married couples in D.C. won’t be able to receive any of the more than 1,100 federal rights and benefits that come with marriage.

Federal marital rights and benefits are denied to same-sex couples under DOMA.

Gay activists hailed the development as an historic landmark for same-sex couples throughout the country and noted that it opens the way for the Council to pass a separate law later this year allowing same-sex marriages to be performed in the District.

The city’s sweeping domestic partnership law provides nearly all of the D.C. rights and benefits of marriage to same-sex and opposite sex domestic partners who register their relationship with the city. But many activists consider domestic partnerships and civil unions — another form of legal recognition for same-sex couples — to be a “separate and unequal” status that denies full equality for same-sex couples that activists say can only come with the right to marry.

The law took effect one week after a D.C. Superior Court judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by a Maryland minister and six supporters seeking to put the law on hold until they completed requirements to overturn the measure through a voter referendum.

Approximately 55 percent of the population of the District of Columbia is black, and churches in the area with large black congregations have been extremely vocal in their opposition to the new law. Ministers have expressed hope they can rally their congregations in opposition to the recognition of same-sex marriage.

In May, when the council first voted on the measure, The Washington Post reported:

After the vote, enraged African American ministers stormed the hallway outside the council chambers and vowed that they will work to oust the members who supported the bill. They caused such an uproar that security officers and D.C. police were called in to clear the hallway.

Read the entire Post report on the May incident here.

In dismissing the lawsuit, Judge Judith Retchin, in a 15-page decision, upheld an earlier ruling by the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics that a referendum seeking to block the same-sex marriage recognition measure would violate the city’s Human Rights Act. The election board and Retchin each ruled that the referendum could not be held because it would violate the human rights law’s provision banning discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Bishop Harry Jackson Jr., pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville, Md., vowed to continue his efforts to oppose same-sex marriage in the District, saying he and his supporters would seek to overturn the law in the coming months through a voter initiative.

**********************

Underwire Bra as Protective Device

I recently had to attend an event at the county courthouse. This required me to stand in line and then pass through the security station and metal detector.

I set off the machine and it squealed and buzzed like an old-school video game.

The security-dyke-in-uniform eyed me up and down. I was wearing a nice-fitting black wool crepe suit with pants, and a white t-shirt. I wasn’t wearing jewelery or a watch.

She asked me to step forward.

She waved the wand up and down me and it buzzed at my breasts. She stepped away and tried again. Again, the wand shreaked as it came near the ladies.

“Huh,” she said. “This thing just loves underwire bras.”

I looked her straight in the eyes and flicked my eyebrows ever so slightly. “I do too.”

She turned bright red and waved me through.

(What, no strip search?)

Speaking of underwires, this today from the Associated Press:

The metal underwire in a Detroit woman’s bra was credited with deflecting a bullet fired at her during a break-in at a neighbor’s home. Detroit police Officer Leon Rahmaan said the 57-year-old woman apparently looked out her window Tuesday when one of three men fired the shot.

He said the slug smashed through her window pane before hitting the bra’s underwire. It did not penetrate her skin.

Cross my heart.

**********************

Closing with the Ironic Cover

I love live music, and I have a little game I play at concerts. Before the show starts, I try to guess the last song that will be played. If I’m feeling confident, I try to name the last two.

For example, at a Melissa Etheridge show, I’d guess that her second-to-last song would be something popular, maybe “I Need to Wake Up,” the song from Al Gore’s movie, An Inconvenient Truth. Then she would probably finish with something that everyone in the room would know and get on their feet for: “Somebody Bring Me Some Water,” or “Come to My Window”.

I’m pretty good at this guessing game, which is why I love it when an artist or band plays an unexpected cover – something outside their genre, and just plain fun.

The first time I heard a musician do this, it was singer-songwriter Patty Larkin closing with Nancy Sinatra’s “These Boots are Made for Walking”.

Speaking of fun, here’s Nancy’s original version on The Ed Sullivan Show, a little eye and fashion candy:

Some years ago I was the “sound guy” for an all-girl rock band. They were very earnest about what they were doing, and I spent months trying to get them to understand the charms of the ironic cover.

I would suggest a song, and the conversation would go like this:

Them: “But that’s not the kind of song we would play.”

Me: “Right. But that’s what makes it so ironic.”

Them: “But that’s not the kind of song we would play.”

Me: “Never mind.”

Some bands are just good at it. They manage to take ownership of the most unlikely songs and get the audience singing along.

Girlyman is one of these bands. Wildly talented songwriters, they’re almost as famous for the songs they didn’t write, often closing with a send-up of Dusty Springfield’s “Son of a Preacher Man,” lead by Nate. Although, the last few times I’ve seen them, they were tackling “Angel of the Morning,” made famous by Juice Newton, and “Fist City,” a Loretta Lynn smack down. (Check out their music on their MySpace page.)

When I saw a group concert with Mary Chapin Carpenter, Dar Williams, Shawn Colvin, and Patti Griffin sharing a stage, they closed with a Backstreet Boys song. And, once I saw British singer-songwriter Richard Thompson close with Nirvana’s “Smells Like Teen Spirit”.

So last night at Slim’s in San Francisco, waiting for Chris Pureka to come on stage, I commented to my traveling companion that I hoped Chris would come up with a good ironic cover for the close.

“That won’t happen,” she said. “Chris Pureka isn’t ironic.”

She may be right. But Chris did close with a powerful cover of Bob Dylan’s “Rock Me Mama”. While it wasn’t completely ironic, it did keep me humming all day.

Rock me mama, like a wagon wheel
Rock me mama any way you feel

Hey,
mama, rock me

(If you’ve seen a good ironic cover, put it in the comments.)

**********************

Transgender California Natives Can Change Birth Certificates

Native sons of the Golden State who have become daughters – and native daughters who have become sons – can now have their birth certificates changed to match their gender, regardless of where they currently live.

Until the recent First District Court of Appeals ruling, California law only allowed people to obtain a birth certificate with the proper gender if they lived in the same county of their birth, or if their current county of residence allowed them to request one.

However, many counties around the country will not recognize this right, an obstacle that this ruling now removes

**********************